Health equity and access in implantable neural device research

Researchers are exploring a new generation of implantable brain devices designed to read, process, and translate brain signals into actions. Scientific research is meant to benefit everyone, so it's only fair that the responsibilities and risks of participating in research are shared fairly across society. Fairness requires not only avoiding the overrepresentation of vulnerable populations but also ensuring that members of vulnerable populations have equitable opportunities to participate. We're concerned that neural device research could unintentionally create inequities in who gets included in or excluded from participation. We call for a multi-stakeholder effort involving investigators, research sponsors, ethicists, and patient advocates to develop concrete policies and ethical guidelines that strike the right balance: ensuring access and opportunity while safeguarding against participation driven by socioeconomic desperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurological Research
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2590095
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health equity and access in implantable neural device research

Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst
Neurological Research
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Health equity and access in implantable neural device research

Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst
article en

Abstract

Researchers are exploring a new generation of implantable brain devices designed to read, process, and translate brain signals into actions. Scientific research is meant to benefit everyone, so it's only fair that the responsibilities and risks of participating in research are shared fairly across society. Fairness requires not only avoiding the overrepresentation of vulnerable populations but also ensuring that members of vulnerable populations have equitable opportunities to participate. We're concerned that neural device research could unintentionally create inequities in who gets included in or excluded from participation. We call for a multi-stakeholder effort involving investigators, research sponsors, ethicists, and patient advocates to develop concrete policies and ethical guidelines that strike the right balance: ensuring access and opportunity while safeguarding against participation driven by socioeconomic desperation.

Neurological Research
Central Michigan University (US), Rowan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Health equity and access in implantable neural device research — Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst · Neurological Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS