Global trends in macrolide and lincosamide resistance in Streptococcus species: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background The widespread use of macrolides and lincosamides, particularly for treating infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) (group A Streptococcus (GAS)), and S. pneumoniae has led to a concerning rise in antibiotic resistance. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance rates of macrolides and lincosamides in clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and S. agalactiae (group B Streptococcus (GBS)) based on time, geographical areas, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and guidelines. Method We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2015 and 2023. Study quality was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. Resistance rates were calculated with a random-effects model, supplemented by meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and identification of outliers. Statistical analyses were performed in R using the metafor package. Results This review analyzed 276 studies across 62 countries. Pooled resistance was highest for clarithromycin (57.6%) and azithromycin (55.8%), followed by erythromycin (41.5%) and clindamycin (29.5%), all with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 > 98%, p < 0.001). Resistance differed significantly across various countries and continents (p < 0.001). Resistance patterns varied notably by species, with S. pneumoniae exhibiting the highest resistance to all tested macrolides and lincosamides, followed closely by S. agalactiae. In contrast, S. pyogenes consistently showed the lowest resistance levels across all antibiotics examined. A significant upward trend in resistance was observed over time for erythromycin (p = 0.019) and clindamycin (p = 0.003). According to the meta-regression, the erythromycin resistance rate increased over time (r = 0.094, p = 0.005). Conclusion Macrolide and lincosamide resistance among key Streptococcus species are alarmingly high and rising globally, with marked species-specific and regional differences. Our findings underscore the urgent need for standardized susceptibility testing protocols, targeted surveillance by species, and enhanced antibiotic stewardship efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11884-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global trends in macrolide and lincosamide resistance in Streptococcus species: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohammad Reza Mofid, Narges Golab, Tahereh Navidifar, Masoumeh Beig et al.
2 citations
BMC Infectious Diseases
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
3.76
article

Global trends in macrolide and lincosamide resistance in Streptococcus species: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohammad Reza Mofid, Narges Golab, Tahereh Navidifar, Masoumeh Beig, Fatemeh Kazemi, Elnaz Parvizi, Mohammad Sholeh, Ali Shivaee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The widespread use of macrolides and lincosamides, particularly for treating infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) (group A Streptococcus (GAS)), and S. pneumoniae has led to a concerning rise in antibiotic resistance. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance rates of macrolides and lincosamides in clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and S. agalactiae (group B Streptococcus (GBS)) based on time, geographical areas, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and guidelines. Method We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2015 and 2023. Study quality was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. Resistance rates were calculated with a random-effects model, supplemented by meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and identification of outliers. Statistical analyses were performed in R using the metafor package. Results This review analyzed 276 studies across 62 countries. Pooled resistance was highest for clarithromycin (57.6%) and azithromycin (55.8%), followed by erythromycin (41.5%) and clindamycin (29.5%), all with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 > 98%, p < 0.001). Resistance differed significantly across various countries and continents (p < 0.001). Resistance patterns varied notably by species, with S. pneumoniae exhibiting the highest resistance to all tested macrolides and lincosamides, followed closely by S. agalactiae. In contrast, S. pyogenes consistently showed the lowest resistance levels across all antibiotics examined. A significant upward trend in resistance was observed over time for erythromycin (p = 0.019) and clindamycin (p = 0.003). According to the meta-regression, the erythromycin resistance rate increased over time (r = 0.094, p = 0.005). Conclusion Macrolide and lincosamide resistance among key Streptococcus species are alarmingly high and rising globally, with marked species-specific and regional differences. Our findings underscore the urgent need for standardized susceptibility testing protocols, targeted surveillance by species, and enhanced antibiotic stewardship efforts.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 25(1)
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Pasteur Institute of Iran (IR), Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR), Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.