The suspect citizen: Institutional Islamophobia, prevent, and the British Muslim experience

This article examines British Muslim experiences of the UK’s Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, drawing on 18 qualitative interviews in London and Birmingham. It argues that Prevent contributes to the racialisation and securitisation of Muslims, reinforcing their image as a ‘suspect community’, which aligns with existing critiques of counter-terrorism policies being discriminatory and Islamophobic. However, the study emphasises the diversity within Muslim responses, identifying reactions of rejection, justification , and ambivalence , thus moving beyond monolithic portrayals. It highlights how intersectional factors such as race, gender (particularly for Muslims of colour and veiled women), and socio-political context shape these interactions. Furthermore, the research challenges simplistic state-versus-community views by acknowledging variations in how Prevent is implemented locally and recognising the agency of Muslims in negotiating and resisting the policy. This study advocates for refining the ‘suspect community’ concept through an intersectional, context-sensitive lens that captures internal diversity and lived complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251385368
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The suspect citizen: Institutional Islamophobia, prevent, and the British Muslim experience

Tahir Abbas, Judith Bruchhaus
1 citations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

The suspect citizen: Institutional Islamophobia, prevent, and the British Muslim experience

Tahir Abbas, Judith Bruchhaus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines British Muslim experiences of the UK’s Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, drawing on 18 qualitative interviews in London and Birmingham. It argues that Prevent contributes to the racialisation and securitisation of Muslims, reinforcing their image as a ‘suspect community’, which aligns with existing critiques of counter-terrorism policies being discriminatory and Islamophobic. However, the study emphasises the diversity within Muslim responses, identifying reactions of rejection, justification , and ambivalence , thus moving beyond monolithic portrayals. It highlights how intersectional factors such as race, gender (particularly for Muslims of colour and veiled women), and socio-political context shape these interactions. Furthermore, the research challenges simplistic state-versus-community views by acknowledging variations in how Prevent is implemented locally and recognising the agency of Muslims in negotiating and resisting the policy. This study advocates for refining the ‘suspect community’ concept through an intersectional, context-sensitive lens that captures internal diversity and lived complexity.

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Leiden University (NL), Hague Institute for Global Justice (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.