Glucocorticoid Treatment in Severe Asthma

Severe asthma affects approximately 3% to 10% of the asthmatic population and is characterized by persistent symptoms and frequent exacerbations despite high-intensity therapy. Historically, glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory effects. However, long-term systemic GC use is associated with substantial toxicity and heterogeneous clinical response, largely influenced by underlying inflammatory endotypes. Type 2 (T2) asthma, marked by eosinophilia and cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, generally responds well to GCs. In contrast, non-T2 phenotypes, often associated with neutrophilic inflammation, obesity, or smoking, exhibit GC resistance. Molecular mechanisms underlying GC resistance include GRβ overexpression, impaired GRα nuclear translocation via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, and histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) inactivation by oxidative stress. Therapeutic strategies for severe asthma involve maximizing inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and adding long-acting bronchodilators or biologics before considering maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Despite these guidelines, OCS overuse remains common, with many patients exposed to cumulative doses associated with severe adverse effects. These include osteoporosis, diabetes, infections, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and adrenal suppression. Therefore, reducing systemic GC exposure is a key objective in modern asthma management. Biologic therapies targeting IgE (omalizumab), IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab), IL-5Rα (benralizumab), IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab) have shown substantial OCS-sparing effects in clinical trials, enabling dose reduction or discontinuation in many patients with steroid-dependent asthma. These agents, aligned with precision medicine principles, allow for phenotype-specific treatment and improved safety profiles. Future efforts should focus on improving biomarker-driven treatment selection, expanding non-T2 therapeutic options, and implementing steroid stewardship protocols. In conclusion, while GCs remain essential for acute exacerbations and as bridging therapy, their chronic use should be minimized. Biologic therapies offer a transformative opportunity to reduce GC burden, improving long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients with severe asthma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2746-4469
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glucocorticoid Treatment in Severe Asthma

María Florencia Pilia, Xavier Muñoz, David Espejo-Castellanos, Christian Romero-Mesones et al.
3 citations
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Asthma and respiratory diseases
3.49
article

Glucocorticoid Treatment in Severe Asthma

María Florencia Pilia, Xavier Muñoz, David Espejo-Castellanos, Christian Romero-Mesones, Inigo Ojanguren-Arranz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Severe asthma affects approximately 3% to 10% of the asthmatic population and is characterized by persistent symptoms and frequent exacerbations despite high-intensity therapy. Historically, glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory effects. However, long-term systemic GC use is associated with substantial toxicity and heterogeneous clinical response, largely influenced by underlying inflammatory endotypes. Type 2 (T2) asthma, marked by eosinophilia and cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, generally responds well to GCs. In contrast, non-T2 phenotypes, often associated with neutrophilic inflammation, obesity, or smoking, exhibit GC resistance. Molecular mechanisms underlying GC resistance include GRβ overexpression, impaired GRα nuclear translocation via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, and histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) inactivation by oxidative stress. Therapeutic strategies for severe asthma involve maximizing inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and adding long-acting bronchodilators or biologics before considering maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Despite these guidelines, OCS overuse remains common, with many patients exposed to cumulative doses associated with severe adverse effects. These include osteoporosis, diabetes, infections, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and adrenal suppression. Therefore, reducing systemic GC exposure is a key objective in modern asthma management. Biologic therapies targeting IgE (omalizumab), IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab), IL-5Rα (benralizumab), IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab) have shown substantial OCS-sparing effects in clinical trials, enabling dose reduction or discontinuation in many patients with steroid-dependent asthma. These agents, aligned with precision medicine principles, allow for phenotype-specific treatment and improved safety profiles. Future efforts should focus on improving biomarker-driven treatment selection, expanding non-T2 therapeutic options, and implementing steroid stewardship protocols. In conclusion, while GCs remain essential for acute exacerbations and as bridging therapy, their chronic use should be minimized. Biologic therapies offer a transformative opportunity to reduce GC burden, improving long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients with severe asthma.

Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineVol. 47(01)
Hebron University (PS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.