A Mixing System for Uniform, Reproducible Viscous Bioinks Preparation

<i>Rationale</i>: Extrusion 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing tissue engineering technique that uses cell-laden viscous biomaterials known as bioinks. Manually mixing cell suspensions into viscous biomaterials can be challenging due to the high viscosity ratio between the two fluids. Static mixers are an attractive approach as they can quickly and reproducibly mix two fluids, including those with a high viscosity ratio. However, static mixers intended for viscous applications have not been comprehensively investigated for bioink preparation. This work evaluates the mixing performance, shear stress, and cell viability using four different types of static mixers intended for high viscosity mixing. <i>Methods</i>: Three static mixers intended for mixing viscous solutions were designed based on the Sulzer SMX, Ross ISG, and serpentine mixers and fabricated using resin 3D printing. CELLMIXER, a Kenics-style static mixer commercially available through CELLINK, was used as a comparator. Two biomaterial inks based on PEGDA and methacrylated gelatin were used to characterize each mixer's performance. Shear stress was estimated via fluid dynamics simulations using shear-thinning attributes measured experimentally through rheology. Mixing effectiveness was evaluated using fluorescent beads, from which the most effective design was chosen for live cell mixing experiments. Viability of cell lines (A549 and NIH-3T3) and primary human lung fibroblasts was evaluated postmixing. A demonstration of extrusion bioprinting was performed using the mixed bioinks. <i>Results</i>: The SMX-style mixer provided the most uniform mixing and yielded the lowest simulated shear stresses among the designs investigated. A549, NIH-3T3, and primary human lung fibroblasts maintained viabilities above 96% postmixing using the SMX-style mixer with a more homogeneous cell distribution compared to the CELLMIXER. The bioprinting demonstration validated our mixing system for producing viable tissue constructs with evenly distributed cells. <i>Conclusions</i>: We present a simple, reproducible, and flexible system for mixing cells into viscous biomaterial inks. Our approach facilitates standardized fabrication of cell-laden tissue constructs to ensure consistency in the growing field of extrusion 3D bioprinting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c01334
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixing System for Uniform, Reproducible Viscous Bioinks Preparation

Mabel Barreiro Carpio, Aidee Verónica Arizpe Tafoya, David A. González‐Martínez, Ryan Singer et al.
1 citations
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
article

A Mixing System for Uniform, Reproducible Viscous Bioinks Preparation

Mabel Barreiro Carpio, Aidee Verónica Arizpe Tafoya, David A. González‐Martínez, Ryan Singer, Jeremy A. Hirota, Mohammadhossein Dabaghi, Eduardo González‐Martínez, Jose Moran‐Mirabal, Yushi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Rationale</i>: Extrusion 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing tissue engineering technique that uses cell-laden viscous biomaterials known as bioinks. Manually mixing cell suspensions into viscous biomaterials can be challenging due to the high viscosity ratio between the two fluids. Static mixers are an attractive approach as they can quickly and reproducibly mix two fluids, including those with a high viscosity ratio. However, static mixers intended for viscous applications have not been comprehensively investigated for bioink preparation. This work evaluates the mixing performance, shear stress, and cell viability using four different types of static mixers intended for high viscosity mixing. <i>Methods</i>: Three static mixers intended for mixing viscous solutions were designed based on the Sulzer SMX, Ross ISG, and serpentine mixers and fabricated using resin 3D printing. CELLMIXER, a Kenics-style static mixer commercially available through CELLINK, was used as a comparator. Two biomaterial inks based on PEGDA and methacrylated gelatin were used to characterize each mixer's performance. Shear stress was estimated via fluid dynamics simulations using shear-thinning attributes measured experimentally through rheology. Mixing effectiveness was evaluated using fluorescent beads, from which the most effective design was chosen for live cell mixing experiments. Viability of cell lines (A549 and NIH-3T3) and primary human lung fibroblasts was evaluated postmixing. A demonstration of extrusion bioprinting was performed using the mixed bioinks. <i>Results</i>: The SMX-style mixer provided the most uniform mixing and yielded the lowest simulated shear stresses among the designs investigated. A549, NIH-3T3, and primary human lung fibroblasts maintained viabilities above 96% postmixing using the SMX-style mixer with a more homogeneous cell distribution compared to the CELLMIXER. The bioprinting demonstration validated our mixing system for producing viable tissue constructs with evenly distributed cells. <i>Conclusions</i>: We present a simple, reproducible, and flexible system for mixing cells into viscous biomaterial inks. Our approach facilitates standardized fabrication of cell-laden tissue constructs to ensure consistency in the growing field of extrusion 3D bioprinting.

ACS Biomaterials Science & EngineeringVol. 11(12)
Western University (CA), North Carolina State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), Hamilton General Hospital (CA), Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research (CA), Institute for Respiratory Health (AU), Centre for Sight (IN), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.