FURTHER VALIDATION OF THE PATIENT/PARENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE OF FRACTURE HEALING (PROOF-LE) QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LOWER EXTREMITY FRACTURES IN CHILDREN

Clinical trials of pediatric fractures seldom show differences based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), possibly because the PROMs do not adequately capture patients’/parents’ perspectives about outcomes that matter. The Patient Reported Outcomes of Fracture Healing (PROOF) questionnaires are a new set of PROMs designed specifically for children's fractures. Derived from parents and patients, the PROOF includes 4 domains (Scores:0-100): “How it Looks’; “How it Feels”; “How it Works”; and “How it Healed”, which captures the overall recovery experience. This project evaluates the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the PROOF-LE for lower extremity fractures in children. Children with lower extremity fractures were prospectively enrolled. Parents and children (> 8yrs) completed the parent & child versions of the PROOF-LE respectively, at 3 time-points from treatment until full recovery. Test-retest reliability (2-weeks apart) was determined at final healing using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); and internal consistency using Cronbach's Alpha. Convergent validity was assessed comparing the total and domain scores of the PROOF-LE to realted domains of the PODCI using Pearson correlation. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing fractures with and without complications. Responsiveness (sensitivity to change) was evaluated over 3 time-points using standardized response means (SRM). Finally, parents’ scores were compared with their respective children's scores, using paired t-test and Pearson correlation. 335 children's [197 boys/138 girls; mean age (SD): 9.9yrs (4.4)] fractures of the pelvis/hip (4), femur (99), knee (24), tibia (141), ankle (40) and foot (27) were included. The PROOF-LE demonstrated moderate to excellent test-retest reliability for the Total and domain scores for children (ICC:0.75 - 0.89) and parents (ICC:0.69-0.88); high internal consistency for children (0.72 - 0.9) and parents (0.72 - 0.91). PROOF-LE domain scores correlated positively with like domains of the PODCI. As hypothesized, fractures with complications scored significantly worse than those without. The PROOF-LE was highly responsive with SRMs of 0.99 (parents) and 1.2 (children) for the total scores over three time-points. Parents’ scores correlated strongly with their children (r=0.89; p < 0 .001) with parents’ scores an average of 2.9 points lower than children's. The PROOF-LE is the only PROM designed specifically to measure outcomes of pediatric lower extremity fractures and their treatments. The child and parent versions of the PROOF-LE are reliable, internally consistent, valid and responsive for lower extremity fractures in children. The PROOF-LE reports scores across four different domains and in total, which allows it to better distinguish pros and cons of competing treatments, information about which will inform future decision-making about treatment choices. The PROOF-LE may be considered as the PROM of choice for pediatric lower extremity fractures and their treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.103
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FURTHER VALIDATION OF THE PATIENT/PARENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE OF FRACTURE HEALING (PROOF-LE) QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LOWER EXTREMITY FRACTURES IN CHILDREN

Sherri Sharp, Unni Narayanan, Stephan Moll, James Chan et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Bone fractures and treatments
article

FURTHER VALIDATION OF THE PATIENT/PARENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE OF FRACTURE HEALING (PROOF-LE) QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LOWER EXTREMITY FRACTURES IN CHILDREN

Sherri Sharp, Unni Narayanan, Stephan Moll, James Chan, Mark Camp, Anne Murphy, Sarah Yang
article en

Abstract

Clinical trials of pediatric fractures seldom show differences based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), possibly because the PROMs do not adequately capture patients’/parents’ perspectives about outcomes that matter. The Patient Reported Outcomes of Fracture Healing (PROOF) questionnaires are a new set of PROMs designed specifically for children's fractures. Derived from parents and patients, the PROOF includes 4 domains (Scores:0-100): “How it Looks’; “How it Feels”; “How it Works”; and “How it Healed”, which captures the overall recovery experience. This project evaluates the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the PROOF-LE for lower extremity fractures in children. Children with lower extremity fractures were prospectively enrolled. Parents and children (> 8yrs) completed the parent & child versions of the PROOF-LE respectively, at 3 time-points from treatment until full recovery. Test-retest reliability (2-weeks apart) was determined at final healing using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); and internal consistency using Cronbach's Alpha. Convergent validity was assessed comparing the total and domain scores of the PROOF-LE to realted domains of the PODCI using Pearson correlation. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing fractures with and without complications. Responsiveness (sensitivity to change) was evaluated over 3 time-points using standardized response means (SRM). Finally, parents’ scores were compared with their respective children's scores, using paired t-test and Pearson correlation. 335 children's [197 boys/138 girls; mean age (SD): 9.9yrs (4.4)] fractures of the pelvis/hip (4), femur (99), knee (24), tibia (141), ankle (40) and foot (27) were included. The PROOF-LE demonstrated moderate to excellent test-retest reliability for the Total and domain scores for children (ICC:0.75 - 0.89) and parents (ICC:0.69-0.88); high internal consistency for children (0.72 - 0.9) and parents (0.72 - 0.91). PROOF-LE domain scores correlated positively with like domains of the PODCI. As hypothesized, fractures with complications scored significantly worse than those without. The PROOF-LE was highly responsive with SRMs of 0.99 (parents) and 1.2 (children) for the total scores over three time-points. Parents’ scores correlated strongly with their children (r=0.89; p < 0 .001) with parents’ scores an average of 2.9 points lower than children's. The PROOF-LE is the only PROM designed specifically to measure outcomes of pediatric lower extremity fractures and their treatments. The child and parent versions of the PROOF-LE are reliable, internally consistent, valid and responsive for lower extremity fractures in children. The PROOF-LE reports scores across four different domains and in total, which allows it to better distinguish pros and cons of competing treatments, information about which will inform future decision-making about treatment choices. The PROOF-LE may be considered as the PROM of choice for pediatric lower extremity fractures and their treatments.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_13)
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.