Discussion on the Paper “Is Complexity the Answer to the Continuum vs. Discontinuum Question in Rock Engineering?” by Erharter and Elmo in Rock Mech Rock Eng (2025)

Abstract In their recent contribution, Erharter and Elmo (Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2025) proposed to resolve the long-standing continuum vs. discontinuum question in rock engineering by characterising rock mass complexity. While their attempt to introduce quantitative metrics into this debate is commendable, their treatment tends to apply the concepts of complexity and emergence in ways that do not align with their established meanings. In this Discussion, I address these issues by providing several points of clarification, particularly concerning how the authors have positioned their work in relation to complexity science and to my earlier article (Lei, Rock Mech Bull, 2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-05120-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion on the Paper “Is Complexity the Answer to the Continuum vs. Discontinuum Question in Rock Engineering?” by Erharter and Elmo in Rock Mech Rock Eng (2025)

Qinghua Lei
1 citations
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
article

Discussion on the Paper “Is Complexity the Answer to the Continuum vs. Discontinuum Question in Rock Engineering?” by Erharter and Elmo in Rock Mech Rock Eng (2025)

Qinghua Lei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In their recent contribution, Erharter and Elmo (Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2025) proposed to resolve the long-standing continuum vs. discontinuum question in rock engineering by characterising rock mass complexity. While their attempt to introduce quantitative metrics into this debate is commendable, their treatment tends to apply the concepts of complexity and emergence in ways that do not align with their established meanings. In this Discussion, I address these issues by providing several points of clarification, particularly concerning how the authors have positioned their work in relation to complexity science and to my earlier article (Lei, Rock Mech Bull, 2023).

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Uppsala University (SE)
Uppsala Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.