A Cross-Sectional Study of Acceptability and Influence of HEALing Communities Study Communications Campaign Messaging Among Community Members in Four U.S. States

PurposeUnderstanding reactions to health communication campaigns is essential to designing effective messaging. Multi-year campaigns through The Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>®</sup> Initiative (HEALing) Communities Study (HCS) were implemented from April 2020 - June 2022. Responses to HCS campaign messages and statewide campaign messages were evaluated.DesignCross-sectional, self-reported surveys of different respondents at 3 timepoints.SettingN = 33 communities across Kentucky, Ohio, Massachusetts, and New York.SubjectsN = 2368 respondents recruited from Facebook/Instagram.MeasuresMessage acceptability survey items assessed attention, understandability, and visuals/text match. Message influence items assessed whether the message made the respondent want to carry naloxone, learn more about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), or seek help for OUD. Items were scaled from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).AnalysisAll outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models adjusted for community as a random effect.ResultsAmong naloxone campaigns, HCS message acceptability was higher than statewide messages (3.98, 95% CI = 3.94-4.02 vs 3.93, 95% CI = 3.89-3.97, <i>P</i> = 0.002). HCS message influence was also higher than those of statewide messages (3.44, 95% CI = 3.38-3.50 vs 3.40, 95% CI = 3.34-3.46, <i>P</i> = 0.034). Among HCS campaigns, naloxone messaging had the highest acceptability (3.96, 95% CI = 3.92-4.00), followed by MOUD stigma (3.73, 95% CI = 3.70-3.77) and MOUD awareness (3.71, 95% CI = 3.68-3.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The HCS naloxone campaign was also highest rated in terms of influence (3.47, 95% CI = 3.43-3.51, <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThis analysis provides insight into acceptability and potential influence of locally-tailored, opioid-related health campaign messaging.This work was performed under the HEALing Communities Study, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251398985
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cross-Sectional Study of Acceptability and Influence of HEALing Communities Study Communications Campaign Messaging Among Community Members in Four U.S. States

Michael D. Slater, Michael D. Stein, Nicky Lewis, Jamie Luster et al.
American Journal of Health Promotion
Social Media in Health Education
article

A Cross-Sectional Study of Acceptability and Influence of HEALing Communities Study Communications Campaign Messaging Among Community Members in Four U.S. States

Michael D. Slater, Michael D. Stein, Nicky Lewis, Jamie Luster, Kat Asman, Nishita Dsouza, R. Craig Lefebvre, Rouba Chahine, Jennifer Reynolds, Lauren D’Costa, Kara Stephens
article en

Abstract

PurposeUnderstanding reactions to health communication campaigns is essential to designing effective messaging. Multi-year campaigns through The Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>®</sup> Initiative (HEALing) Communities Study (HCS) were implemented from April 2020 - June 2022. Responses to HCS campaign messages and statewide campaign messages were evaluated.DesignCross-sectional, self-reported surveys of different respondents at 3 timepoints.SettingN = 33 communities across Kentucky, Ohio, Massachusetts, and New York.SubjectsN = 2368 respondents recruited from Facebook/Instagram.MeasuresMessage acceptability survey items assessed attention, understandability, and visuals/text match. Message influence items assessed whether the message made the respondent want to carry naloxone, learn more about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), or seek help for OUD. Items were scaled from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).AnalysisAll outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models adjusted for community as a random effect.ResultsAmong naloxone campaigns, HCS message acceptability was higher than statewide messages (3.98, 95% CI = 3.94-4.02 vs 3.93, 95% CI = 3.89-3.97, <i>P</i> = 0.002). HCS message influence was also higher than those of statewide messages (3.44, 95% CI = 3.38-3.50 vs 3.40, 95% CI = 3.34-3.46, <i>P</i> = 0.034). Among HCS campaigns, naloxone messaging had the highest acceptability (3.96, 95% CI = 3.92-4.00), followed by MOUD stigma (3.73, 95% CI = 3.70-3.77) and MOUD awareness (3.71, 95% CI = 3.68-3.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The HCS naloxone campaign was also highest rated in terms of influence (3.47, 95% CI = 3.43-3.51, <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThis analysis provides insight into acceptability and potential influence of locally-tailored, opioid-related health campaign messaging.This work was performed under the HEALing Communities Study, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939.

American Journal of Health Promotion
Boston University (US), Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US), RTI International (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), The Ohio State University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.