COMPARING ACETABULAR COMPONENT POSITION IN DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING FLUOROSCOPY VERSUS IMAGELESS NAVIGATION

Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly used in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve component positioning and minimize leg length discrepancy (LLD). However, imageless optical navigation systems have been shown to reduce the frequency of positional outliers in acetabular cup position in lateral and posterior approach THA. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopy to that of an imageless optical navigation system in DAA THA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 640 primary DAA THAs performed with intraoperative fluoroscopy (n=300 patients) or imageless optical navigation (n=304 patients). Accuracy was compared between fluoroscopy and navigation by measuring acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and LLD. The proportion of components placed within the Lewinnek safe zone was evaluated, as well as those placed within a more precise target range of ± 5° from the surgical target (40° ± 5° inclination, 20° ± 5° anteversion). There was a difference between fluoroscopy and navigation THA in mean acetabular inclination (40.4° SD: 4.7° vs. 42.0° SD: 3.74° respectively, p < 0 .001) and anteversion (17.9° SD: 4.7° vs. 20.3° SD: 3.6° respectively, p < 0 .001). There was no significant difference in the percentage of components positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone (90.3% vs 88.8% respectively, p=0.519). When using the more precise targets, navigation increased the proportion of acetabular components positioned correctly (fluoroscopy: 50.3% vs navigation: 65.6%, p < 0 .01). Mean LLD was higher with use of fluoroscopy compared to navigation (5.5 mm SD: 4.1 mm vs. 4.6 mm SD: 3.4 mm respectively, p < 0 .001). Both fluoroscopy and imageless optical navigation result in accurate component positioning for DAA THA. Navigation was more precise and associated with improved acetabular anteversion placement and restoration of LLD. Navigation is an accurate alternative to fluoroscopy while also reducing radiation exposure to the patient and operating team.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.143
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARING ACETABULAR COMPONENT POSITION IN DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING FLUOROSCOPY VERSUS IMAGELESS NAVIGATION

Sebastian Rodriguez-Elizalde, Barry Cayen, Johnathan R. Lex, Jun-Dong Chang et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

COMPARING ACETABULAR COMPONENT POSITION IN DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING FLUOROSCOPY VERSUS IMAGELESS NAVIGATION

Sebastian Rodriguez-Elizalde, Barry Cayen, Johnathan R. Lex, Jun-Dong Chang, I. R. Perlus, M-A. Manzo
article en

Abstract

Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly used in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve component positioning and minimize leg length discrepancy (LLD). However, imageless optical navigation systems have been shown to reduce the frequency of positional outliers in acetabular cup position in lateral and posterior approach THA. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopy to that of an imageless optical navigation system in DAA THA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 640 primary DAA THAs performed with intraoperative fluoroscopy (n=300 patients) or imageless optical navigation (n=304 patients). Accuracy was compared between fluoroscopy and navigation by measuring acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and LLD. The proportion of components placed within the Lewinnek safe zone was evaluated, as well as those placed within a more precise target range of ± 5° from the surgical target (40° ± 5° inclination, 20° ± 5° anteversion). There was a difference between fluoroscopy and navigation THA in mean acetabular inclination (40.4° SD: 4.7° vs. 42.0° SD: 3.74° respectively, p < 0 .001) and anteversion (17.9° SD: 4.7° vs. 20.3° SD: 3.6° respectively, p < 0 .001). There was no significant difference in the percentage of components positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone (90.3% vs 88.8% respectively, p=0.519). When using the more precise targets, navigation increased the proportion of acetabular components positioned correctly (fluoroscopy: 50.3% vs navigation: 65.6%, p < 0 .01). Mean LLD was higher with use of fluoroscopy compared to navigation (5.5 mm SD: 4.1 mm vs. 4.6 mm SD: 3.4 mm respectively, p < 0 .001). Both fluoroscopy and imageless optical navigation result in accurate component positioning for DAA THA. Navigation was more precise and associated with improved acetabular anteversion placement and restoration of LLD. Navigation is an accurate alternative to fluoroscopy while also reducing radiation exposure to the patient and operating team.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_13)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.