Hybrid method benchmark dose estimation with a heterogeneous variance structure

For several decades, the benchmark dose (BMD) methodology has been recommended for estimating safe exposure levels to toxic substances. When the response variable is continuous, the BMD and its lower confidence limit (BMDL) are often estimated using the hybrid method, which assumes a normal distribution to model the probability of an adverse response. Typically, this approach relies on a dose-response model with the assumption of constant standard deviation across all doses. However, when this assumption is violated, it can lead to biased estimates, and current implementations of the hybrid method do not account for this. In this paper, we introduce an extended class of dose-response models that allows for variation in the standard deviation across doses and adapt the hybrid method accordingly. We illustrate the proposed method using two data sets with two types of heteroscedasticity and show, through simulation, that addressing variance heterogeneity reduces bias and results in BMDL estimates with coverage closer to the nominal level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf168
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid method benchmark dose estimation with a heterogeneous variance structure

Signe Marie Jensen, Jens Riis Baalkilde
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Hybrid method benchmark dose estimation with a heterogeneous variance structure

Signe Marie Jensen, Jens Riis Baalkilde
article en

Abstract

For several decades, the benchmark dose (BMD) methodology has been recommended for estimating safe exposure levels to toxic substances. When the response variable is continuous, the BMD and its lower confidence limit (BMDL) are often estimated using the hybrid method, which assumes a normal distribution to model the probability of an adverse response. Typically, this approach relies on a dose-response model with the assumption of constant standard deviation across all doses. However, when this assumption is violated, it can lead to biased estimates, and current implementations of the hybrid method do not account for this. In this paper, we introduce an extended class of dose-response models that allows for variation in the standard deviation across doses and adapt the hybrid method accordingly. We illustrate the proposed method using two data sets with two types of heteroscedasticity and show, through simulation, that addressing variance heterogeneity reduces bias and results in BMDL estimates with coverage closer to the nominal level.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
University of Copenhagen (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid method benchmark dose estimation with a heterogeneous variance structure — Signe Marie Jensen, Jens Riis Baalkilde · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS