Bringing contact interventions to the lab: Effects of brief bilateral discussions on interethnic trust in Senegal

The contact hypothesis posits that interaction with outgroup members can reduce prejudice and improve intergroup relations. While the overall effects of contact have been found to be positive, some studies have found null or even negative effects. We aim to contribute to the understanding of the scope conditions of contact interventions, by singling out the effects of a common component of all existing contact interventions, namely bilateral discussions. Our brief contact is found to be effective in increasing interethnic trust toward the individuals met during the intervention, in line with previous results from longer interventions. However, the results do not generalize to the collective level. Our heterogeneity analyses fail to find evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect. • We examine the effects of brief interethnic contact in Northern Senegal. • The contact treatment consists of a structured discussion replicable across contexts. • Contact increases trust in the interaction partner but does not reduce ingroup bias. • We do not find evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107247
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bringing contact interventions to the lab: Effects of brief bilateral discussions on interethnic trust in Senegal

Guillaume Hollard, Omar Sene, Gwen-Jirō Clochard
World Development
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Bringing contact interventions to the lab: Effects of brief bilateral discussions on interethnic trust in Senegal

Guillaume Hollard, Omar Sene, Gwen-Jirō Clochard
article en

Abstract

The contact hypothesis posits that interaction with outgroup members can reduce prejudice and improve intergroup relations. While the overall effects of contact have been found to be positive, some studies have found null or even negative effects. We aim to contribute to the understanding of the scope conditions of contact interventions, by singling out the effects of a common component of all existing contact interventions, namely bilateral discussions. Our brief contact is found to be effective in increasing interethnic trust toward the individuals met during the intervention, in line with previous results from longer interventions. However, the results do not generalize to the collective level. Our heterogeneity analyses fail to find evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect. • We examine the effects of brief interethnic contact in Northern Senegal. • The contact treatment consists of a structured discussion replicable across contexts. • Contact increases trust in the interaction partner but does not reduce ingroup bias. • We do not find evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity.

World DevelopmentVol. 199
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Osaka University of Economics (JP), University of the Latin American Educational Center (AR), Institute for Social and Economic Research (GB), Université Alioune Diop de Bambey (SN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.