Enhanced 4D diffusion-weighted PROPELLER echo-planar imaging with collaborative blade reconstruction

<i>Objective.</i>Four-dimensional diffusion-weighted imaging (4D-DWI) offers enhanced soft-tissue contrast for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) compared to conventional 4D-magnetic resonance imaging. However, its clinical application has been hindered by geometric distortion or prolonged acquisition times. This study introduces an improved respiratory-correlated 4D-DWI technique to address these critical limitations.<i>Approach.</i>The proposed 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR technique consists of four stages: data acquisition, coil sensitivity and phase error maps estimation, retrospective data sorting, and a joint-blade collaborative reconstruction (JBCR) step. We evaluated its performance against the previous 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI using both simulations and<i>in vivo</i>experiments. Evaluation metrics included<i>k</i>-space uniformity requirements, point spread function (PSF) quality, minimum required sampling factor (SF), image quality, geometric fidelity, and acquisition time. Image quality was assessed using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), high-frequency error norm (HFEN), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); geometric fidelity was evaluated via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Paired<i>t</i>-tests were used for metric comparisons, with statistical significance set at<i>P</i>< 0.05.<i>Main results.</i>Compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI, the proposed 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR eliminated the requirement for strict<i>k</i>-space uniformity while achieving enhanced PSFs with fewer acquisitions. Additionally, 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR yielded significant improvements in image quality compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI across all key metrics: SSIM (0.83-0.92 vs 0.81-0.90,<i>P</i>< 0.05), PSNR (20.56-25.20 vs 20.24-24.48,<i>P</i>< 0.05), HFEN (0.49-0.678 vs 0.52-0.80, P < 0.05), and SNR (31.1-32.6 dB vs 28.6-29.5 dB,<i>P</i>< 0.05). It also exhibited excellent geometric fidelity, as evidenced by DSC (0.90 ± 0.03) and HD (2.37 ± 1.12). Notably, these performance gains were achieved with an SF of 1.9 per diffusion direction, compared to the SF of 2.4 for 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI.<i>Significance.</i>By enabling distortion-free respiratory-correlated 4D-DWI and reducing SF by more than 20% compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI, the 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR technique markedly improves the clinical utility of 4D-DWI for abdominal IGRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae1fce
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced 4D diffusion-weighted PROPELLER echo-planar imaging with collaborative blade reconstruction

Hing‐Chiu Chang, Tian Li, Jing Yan Cai, Dongrong Yang et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Enhanced 4D diffusion-weighted PROPELLER echo-planar imaging with collaborative blade reconstruction

Hing‐Chiu Chang, Tian Li, Jing Yan Cai, Dongrong Yang, Chenyang Liu, Lu Wang
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Four-dimensional diffusion-weighted imaging (4D-DWI) offers enhanced soft-tissue contrast for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) compared to conventional 4D-magnetic resonance imaging. However, its clinical application has been hindered by geometric distortion or prolonged acquisition times. This study introduces an improved respiratory-correlated 4D-DWI technique to address these critical limitations.<i>Approach.</i>The proposed 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR technique consists of four stages: data acquisition, coil sensitivity and phase error maps estimation, retrospective data sorting, and a joint-blade collaborative reconstruction (JBCR) step. We evaluated its performance against the previous 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI using both simulations and<i>in vivo</i>experiments. Evaluation metrics included<i>k</i>-space uniformity requirements, point spread function (PSF) quality, minimum required sampling factor (SF), image quality, geometric fidelity, and acquisition time. Image quality was assessed using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), high-frequency error norm (HFEN), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); geometric fidelity was evaluated via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Paired<i>t</i>-tests were used for metric comparisons, with statistical significance set at<i>P</i>< 0.05.<i>Main results.</i>Compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI, the proposed 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR eliminated the requirement for strict<i>k</i>-space uniformity while achieving enhanced PSFs with fewer acquisitions. Additionally, 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR yielded significant improvements in image quality compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI across all key metrics: SSIM (0.83-0.92 vs 0.81-0.90,<i>P</i>< 0.05), PSNR (20.56-25.20 vs 20.24-24.48,<i>P</i>< 0.05), HFEN (0.49-0.678 vs 0.52-0.80, P < 0.05), and SNR (31.1-32.6 dB vs 28.6-29.5 dB,<i>P</i>< 0.05). It also exhibited excellent geometric fidelity, as evidenced by DSC (0.90 ± 0.03) and HD (2.37 ± 1.12). Notably, these performance gains were achieved with an SF of 1.9 per diffusion direction, compared to the SF of 2.4 for 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI.<i>Significance.</i>By enabling distortion-free respiratory-correlated 4D-DWI and reducing SF by more than 20% compared to 4D-DW-PROPELLER-EPI, the 4D-DW-PROP-EPI-JBCR technique markedly improves the clinical utility of 4D-DWI for abdominal IGRT.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(23)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Duke University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Duke Medical Center (US), University of Hong Kong (HK), Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.