Training MSW Students for Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19: Lessons Learned from Two Programs

This article describes how two Southeastern social work programs delivered integrated behavioral healthcare training to MSW students and social work practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 posed challenges across five domains, including: (a) adaptations to course curricula; (b) adaptations to field education curricula; (c) experiences of grief, distress, and behavioral health issues by stakeholders; (d) organizational strain to universities and departments; and (e) effects on clients and the community. This article describes specific ways in which these two training programs were impacted in these five areas and modified in response, as well as similarities and differences experienced across institutions. Implications for these training programs, and social work education programs in general, are offered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/kh4r-q622
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training MSW Students for Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19: Lessons Learned from Two Programs

Rebecca Brigham, Teri Browne, Melissa Reitmeier, Lisa de Saxe Zerden et al.
UNC Libraries
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Training MSW Students for Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19: Lessons Learned from Two Programs

Rebecca Brigham, Teri Browne, Melissa Reitmeier, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Meryl Kanfer, Aidyn L. Iachini
article en

Abstract

This article describes how two Southeastern social work programs delivered integrated behavioral healthcare training to MSW students and social work practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 posed challenges across five domains, including: (a) adaptations to course curricula; (b) adaptations to field education curricula; (c) experiences of grief, distress, and behavioral health issues by stakeholders; (d) organizational strain to universities and departments; and (e) effects on clients and the community. This article describes specific ways in which these two training programs were impacted in these five areas and modified in response, as well as similarities and differences experienced across institutions. Implications for these training programs, and social work education programs in general, are offered.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
University of South Carolina
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.