Editorial: Clinical uses and alternative approaches of frailty determination

Frailty represents a greater vulnerability to stressors that increases an individual’s susceptibility to adverse health outcomes, such as disability, loss of independence, and death. As one ages, the prevalence of frailty increases and affects up to 50% of those aged 85 and older (Clegg et al., 2013). Efforts to characterize and quantify states of frailty took a substantial leap forward with the emergence of frailty assessment frameworks based on physical frailty and deficit accumulation in the early 2000s (Fried et al., 2001; Rockwood and Mitnitski, 2007; Searle et al., 2008). Since then, frailty tools have been correlated with important health outcomes relevant to aging, have been used to evaluate therapeutic benefit, and are now being explored to help scientists understand the underlying biology of frailty (Fried et al., 2001; Rockwood and Mitnitski, 2007; Brivio et al., 2019; Kwak et al., 2020; Ota and Kodama, 2022). Importantly, frailty tools have also found utility in predicting outcomes of medical and surgical interventions and continue to be refined to improve prognosis in older individuals (Ko, 2019; Nidadavolu et al., 2020; Rabelo et al., 2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/61ps-fw95
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial: Clinical uses and alternative approaches of frailty determination

Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, John A. Batsis
UNC Libraries
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Editorial: Clinical uses and alternative approaches of frailty determination

Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, John A. Batsis
article en

Abstract

Frailty represents a greater vulnerability to stressors that increases an individual’s susceptibility to adverse health outcomes, such as disability, loss of independence, and death. As one ages, the prevalence of frailty increases and affects up to 50% of those aged 85 and older (Clegg et al., 2013). Efforts to characterize and quantify states of frailty took a substantial leap forward with the emergence of frailty assessment frameworks based on physical frailty and deficit accumulation in the early 2000s (Fried et al., 2001; Rockwood and Mitnitski, 2007; Searle et al., 2008). Since then, frailty tools have been correlated with important health outcomes relevant to aging, have been used to evaluate therapeutic benefit, and are now being explored to help scientists understand the underlying biology of frailty (Fried et al., 2001; Rockwood and Mitnitski, 2007; Brivio et al., 2019; Kwak et al., 2020; Ota and Kodama, 2022). Importantly, frailty tools have also found utility in predicting outcomes of medical and surgical interventions and continue to be refined to improve prognosis in older individuals (Ko, 2019; Nidadavolu et al., 2020; Rabelo et al., 2023).

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Editorial: Clinical uses and alternative approaches of frailty determination — Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, John A. Batsis · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS