What makes wearable devices usable? Lessons learned from a 47-day Antarctic ski expedition to the South Pole (INSPIRE22)

Wearable devices are used increasingly within the medical world, ranging from monitoring for head trauma to screening for heat injuries. Understanding what makes these devices tolerable to the end user in remote hostile environments is crucial for research, military, and humanitarian medicine, with broader translational implications. This opportunistic qualitative study trialled five different forms of wearable devices on the Interdisciplinary South Pole Innovation and Research Expedition 2022 (INSPIRE 22), an expedition which skied from the edge of the Antarctic land mass to the South Pole. It also examined the feasibility of near-real time analysis of wearable data from a hostile environment remotely from the UK. Key findings highlighted that usability of wearable devices was impacted by human-device interface factors (comfort, user buy in, and charging) and device resource requirements (power, data, and storage space on a personal mobile phone). Users required a more positive than negative aspects to maintain device interaction. Near-real-time data analysis of wearable technology from extreme environments is feasible but only on a small inconsistent scale due to limited connectivity. Reliable internet access, broader bandwidth, and better user access to data are essential to achieve meaningful health and performance insights for the individual and wider organisations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2583495
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What makes wearable devices usable? Lessons learned from a 47-day Antarctic ski expedition to the South Pole (INSPIRE22)

Natalie Taylor, Robert M. Gifford, Fiona N. Manderson Koivula, S Capella et al.
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Spaceflight effects on biology
article

What makes wearable devices usable? Lessons learned from a 47-day Antarctic ski expedition to the South Pole (INSPIRE22)

Natalie Taylor, Robert M. Gifford, Fiona N. Manderson Koivula, S Capella, Michael Eager, Dean Cresswell
article en

Abstract

Wearable devices are used increasingly within the medical world, ranging from monitoring for head trauma to screening for heat injuries. Understanding what makes these devices tolerable to the end user in remote hostile environments is crucial for research, military, and humanitarian medicine, with broader translational implications. This opportunistic qualitative study trialled five different forms of wearable devices on the Interdisciplinary South Pole Innovation and Research Expedition 2022 (INSPIRE 22), an expedition which skied from the edge of the Antarctic land mass to the South Pole. It also examined the feasibility of near-real time analysis of wearable data from a hostile environment remotely from the UK. Key findings highlighted that usability of wearable devices was impacted by human-device interface factors (comfort, user buy in, and charging) and device resource requirements (power, data, and storage space on a personal mobile phone). Users required a more positive than negative aspects to maintain device interaction. Near-real-time data analysis of wearable technology from extreme environments is feasible but only on a small inconsistent scale due to limited connectivity. Reliable internet access, broader bandwidth, and better user access to data are essential to achieve meaningful health and performance insights for the individual and wider organisations.

Journal of Medical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 50(2)
Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE), Royal Hospital Haslar (GB), Royal Navy (GB), Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (GB), Birmingham Research Park (GB), Institute of Aviation Medicine (CZ), Splunk (United States) (US), Imperial College London (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Spaceflight effects on biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.