Disparate SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes abound, but what makes SARS-CoV-2 bound for rebound?
The global research community attacked the COVID-19 pandemic and its causative agent, SARS-CoV-2, with intense ferocity. Over the past 4 years, one could argue that SARS-CoV-2 was the most intensely studied virus on the planet, dwarfing publication outputs of important pathogens such as HIV and influenza virus: by using PubMed as a proxy for research output, on 30 July 2024 searching for “SARS-CoV-2” yielded 232 127 results spanning 2020 to 2024 while “HIV” and “influenza” yielded 73 112 and 31 877 for the same period, respectively.
Authors
- Timothy P. Sheahan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-2183)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- UNC Libraries
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17615/mxex-c131
- Primary Topic
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00