Comparison of modified midlines versus PICCs in a medical ICU setting: A retrospective study

Intensive care units (ICUs) frequently host patients who often need to be infused with all kinds of drugs. Currently, modified midlines and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used frequently. The present retrospective research aims to assess the use, efficacy, and complications due to modified midlines and PICCs in the treatment of patients in a medical ICU. One hundred forty-two patients hospitalized were inserted with a modified midline or PICC. The choice of catheters for different underlying diseases, actual clinical application, the number of days of dwell time, and complications were compared. Risk factors for complications and puncture-site bleeding were investigated. Compared to PICCs, modified midlines were used far more frequently in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, and coronavirus-19 infections; however, this is not the case in malignancy patients. Moreover, modified midlines were more frequently used for the infusion of vasoactive drugs rather than chemotherapeutic drugs. As for overall complications associated with catheter placement, it was significantly different between the 2 groups. Stratified analysis revealed that in the modified midline group, the incidence of partial or complete catheter removal and puncture-site infection was less than the incidence among PICC group; however, modified midline group developed puncture-site bleeding more frequently than PICC group. Multivariate analyses indicated that a catheter indwelling duration of ≥12 days was the only risk factor for complications, rather than PICC. Meanwhile, it also showed that the 2 risk factors for puncture-site bleeding were an age of ≥60 years and ICU stay ≥14 days. In the medical ICU, modified midlines offer a safe alternative to PICCs for medium-term access in non-chemotherapy patients, reducing rates of unplanned removal and puncture-site infection while simplifying clinical workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046039
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of modified midlines versus PICCs in a medical ICU setting: A retrospective study

Zixi Wang, Guo Long, Yuanming Li, Huan Peng
Medicine
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Comparison of modified midlines versus PICCs in a medical ICU setting: A retrospective study

Zixi Wang, Guo Long, Yuanming Li, Huan Peng
article en

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) frequently host patients who often need to be infused with all kinds of drugs. Currently, modified midlines and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used frequently. The present retrospective research aims to assess the use, efficacy, and complications due to modified midlines and PICCs in the treatment of patients in a medical ICU. One hundred forty-two patients hospitalized were inserted with a modified midline or PICC. The choice of catheters for different underlying diseases, actual clinical application, the number of days of dwell time, and complications were compared. Risk factors for complications and puncture-site bleeding were investigated. Compared to PICCs, modified midlines were used far more frequently in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, and coronavirus-19 infections; however, this is not the case in malignancy patients. Moreover, modified midlines were more frequently used for the infusion of vasoactive drugs rather than chemotherapeutic drugs. As for overall complications associated with catheter placement, it was significantly different between the 2 groups. Stratified analysis revealed that in the modified midline group, the incidence of partial or complete catheter removal and puncture-site infection was less than the incidence among PICC group; however, modified midline group developed puncture-site bleeding more frequently than PICC group. Multivariate analyses indicated that a catheter indwelling duration of ≥12 days was the only risk factor for complications, rather than PICC. Meanwhile, it also showed that the 2 risk factors for puncture-site bleeding were an age of ≥60 years and ICU stay ≥14 days. In the medical ICU, modified midlines offer a safe alternative to PICCs for medium-term access in non-chemotherapy patients, reducing rates of unplanned removal and puncture-site infection while simplifying clinical workflow.

MedicineVol. 104(46)
Central South University (CN), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.