Comparison of the effectiveness of thoracic epidural steroid and local anesthetic injections: A randomized controlled trial

This study primarily aims to evaluate the effectiveness of thoracic interlaminar epidural injections in alleviating pain and enhancing function in patients with chronic mid and/or upper back pain. One hundred patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 50 patients in each. Group I received only a local anesthetic, whereas Group II received a combination of local anesthetic and steroids. The random assignment to either Group I or Group II was determined using a simple computer-generated sequence. The results were evaluated using the numeric rating scale and the revised Oswestry Disability Index. Patients who showed significant improvement for >4 weeks after the first 2 procedures were considered successful. Those who did not were classified as failed participants. Significant improvement was defined as a reduction by >50% in both numeric rating scale and revised Oswestry Disability Index scores, and assessments were conducted at the beginning and 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the intervention. This study included 100 participants divided into 2 groups. At the 12th month, significant pain relief (≥50%) and a reduction of at least 50% in ODI scores from baseline were observed in 86% of patients in Group I and 90% of patients in Group II. The results achieved in this study suggest that chronic thoracic pain of non-facet joint origin can be managed conservatively using thoracic interlaminar epidural injections, either with or without steroids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045994
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the effectiveness of thoracic epidural steroid and local anesthetic injections: A randomized controlled trial

İbrahim Aşık, Derya Bayram, Dostalı Alıyev
Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparison of the effectiveness of thoracic epidural steroid and local anesthetic injections: A randomized controlled trial

İbrahim Aşık, Derya Bayram, Dostalı Alıyev
article en

Abstract

This study primarily aims to evaluate the effectiveness of thoracic interlaminar epidural injections in alleviating pain and enhancing function in patients with chronic mid and/or upper back pain. One hundred patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 50 patients in each. Group I received only a local anesthetic, whereas Group II received a combination of local anesthetic and steroids. The random assignment to either Group I or Group II was determined using a simple computer-generated sequence. The results were evaluated using the numeric rating scale and the revised Oswestry Disability Index. Patients who showed significant improvement for >4 weeks after the first 2 procedures were considered successful. Those who did not were classified as failed participants. Significant improvement was defined as a reduction by >50% in both numeric rating scale and revised Oswestry Disability Index scores, and assessments were conducted at the beginning and 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the intervention. This study included 100 participants divided into 2 groups. At the 12th month, significant pain relief (≥50%) and a reduction of at least 50% in ODI scores from baseline were observed in 86% of patients in Group I and 90% of patients in Group II. The results achieved in this study suggest that chronic thoracic pain of non-facet joint origin can be managed conservatively using thoracic interlaminar epidural injections, either with or without steroids.

MedicineVol. 104(46)
Ministry of Health (TR), TOBB University of Economics and Technology (TR), Ankara University (TR), Mardin Artuklu University (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.