Otto Thenius and Zacharias Frankel on the Text of the Books of Samuel

Abstract Thenius's commentary Die Bücher Samuels (1842) systematically emended the Masoretic Text on the basis of the Septuagint. It was considered groundbreaking, but its numerous text-critical proposals did not stand the test of time (as witness HOTTP). Frankel published a critical review of it (1844), which can be appreciated as an academic rebuttal. But looking at the background of his life and times, as illustrated from his other contemporary writings, it becomes clear that to Frankel an equally important goal was exemplifying how to defend the Jewish heritage and to stand up against assimilation in a hostile environment. In a similar fashion, Thenius's other writings shed light on his text-critical endeavors. His quest for the original text paralleled his quest for the “true Calvary” (1843). With his zeal to find the original words and the original places, sidestepping tradition, he struck a nerve in the Protestant mind. That is why the echo of his claims, rather than what he actually proposed, is still with us today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15699/tc.30.2025.04
Primary Topic
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Otto Thenius and Zacharias Frankel on the Text of the Books of Samuel

Theo A.W. van der Louw
TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
article

Otto Thenius and Zacharias Frankel on the Text of the Books of Samuel

Theo A.W. van der Louw
article en

Abstract

Abstract Thenius's commentary Die Bücher Samuels (1842) systematically emended the Masoretic Text on the basis of the Septuagint. It was considered groundbreaking, but its numerous text-critical proposals did not stand the test of time (as witness HOTTP). Frankel published a critical review of it (1844), which can be appreciated as an academic rebuttal. But looking at the background of his life and times, as illustrated from his other contemporary writings, it becomes clear that to Frankel an equally important goal was exemplifying how to defend the Jewish heritage and to stand up against assimilation in a hostile environment. In a similar fashion, Thenius's other writings shed light on his text-critical endeavors. His quest for the original text paralleled his quest for the “true Calvary” (1843). With his zeal to find the original words and the original places, sidestepping tradition, he struck a nerve in the Protestant mind. That is why the echo of his claims, rather than what he actually proposed, is still with us today.

TC A Journal of Biblical Textual CriticismVol. 30
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Otto Thenius and Zacharias Frankel on the Text of the Books of Samuel — Theo A.W. van der Louw · TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS