Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text

Abstract For most of the twentieth century, modern New Testament textual critics considered GA 2886 to be a copy of GA 205. However, recent and diverse research on the topic has nearly eliminated that view. Indeed, the two leading theories now are that either 2886 was the exemplar for 205 or that the two were copied from the same exemplar. This paper reexamines the histories of these codices under the care of their owner, Cardinal Bessarion, updates the history of scholarly interpretation on the topic, and provides a textual analysis based on a full collation of Family 1 manuscripts in the Gospel of Mark. Based on this evidence, the present study concludes that 2886 is indeed the exemplar for 205.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15699/tc.30.2025.05
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text

Matthew Whidden
TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text

Matthew Whidden
article en

Abstract

Abstract For most of the twentieth century, modern New Testament textual critics considered GA 2886 to be a copy of GA 205. However, recent and diverse research on the topic has nearly eliminated that view. Indeed, the two leading theories now are that either 2886 was the exemplar for 205 or that the two were copied from the same exemplar. This paper reexamines the histories of these codices under the care of their owner, Cardinal Bessarion, updates the history of scholarly interpretation on the topic, and provides a textual analysis based on a full collation of Family 1 manuscripts in the Gospel of Mark. Based on this evidence, the present study concludes that 2886 is indeed the exemplar for 205.

TC A Journal of Biblical Textual CriticismVol. 30
Wycliffe College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text — Matthew Whidden · TC A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS