Understanding Wearable Technology Use Among African American University Students: Implications for Health Equity

This study investigated wearable technology (WT) adoption, usage patterns, and barriers among African American university students, a population disproportionately affected by chronic health disparities and digital inequities. A cross-sectional survey of 75 students revealed that 65.3% (n = 49) reported using WT, while 34.7% (n = 26) did not. Adoption was higher among students aged 22 and older (67.9%), females (69.5%), and graduate students (68.9%). Among WT users, 55.9% used their devices daily, 42.7% had used them for over one year, and the most common uses were exercise and workout tracking (77.6%), step counting (59.2%), and heart rate monitoring (36.7%). Key barriers among non-users included lack of interest (38.5%) and affordability (30.8%), indicating that both motivational and financial factors hinder access and engagement. These findings highlight significant demographic differences in usage and underscore the need for equity-focused strategies in higher education that address affordability, cultural relevance, and health literacy to promote meaningful WT adoption among underserved student populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54111/001c.146320
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Wearable Technology Use Among African American University Students: Implications for Health Equity

James A. Washington, Thierry Lienou
Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Understanding Wearable Technology Use Among African American University Students: Implications for Health Equity

James A. Washington, Thierry Lienou
article en

Abstract

This study investigated wearable technology (WT) adoption, usage patterns, and barriers among African American university students, a population disproportionately affected by chronic health disparities and digital inequities. A cross-sectional survey of 75 students revealed that 65.3% (n = 49) reported using WT, while 34.7% (n = 26) did not. Adoption was higher among students aged 22 and older (67.9%), females (69.5%), and graduate students (68.9%). Among WT users, 55.9% used their devices daily, 42.7% had used them for over one year, and the most common uses were exercise and workout tracking (77.6%), step counting (59.2%), and heart rate monitoring (36.7%). Key barriers among non-users included lack of interest (38.5%) and affordability (30.8%), indicating that both motivational and financial factors hinder access and engagement. These findings highlight significant demographic differences in usage and underscore the need for equity-focused strategies in higher education that address affordability, cultural relevance, and health literacy to promote meaningful WT adoption among underserved student populations.

Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)Vol. Spring 2025(90)
Howard University (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding Wearable Technology Use Among African American University Students: Implications for Health Equity — James A. Washington, Thierry Lienou · Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS