Assessing the Relationship between Policy and Abortion-Related Maternal Mortality in the United States

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, the current legal and political landscape surrounding abortion access in the United States has undergone significant transformations, underscoring the urgent need to address factors influencing maternal health outcomes, including restricted abortion access. As a result, this review seeks to illuminate the connections between restrictive abortion policies and maternal health disparities while emphasizing the importance of intersectional factors such as race, gender identity, and socioeconomic status. Our findings identify legal restrictions, healthcare provider bias, and stigma coupled with patient distrust in the healthcare system as three crucial determinants of maternal mortality among individuals seeking abortion care. To structurally visualize the complex interactions of these determinants and other auxiliary variables, we developed a causal loop diagram (CLD), consisting of three reinforcing loops and a central balancing loop suggesting mitigation strategies through comprehensive sexual health education. Another intervention we have proposed involves comprehensive reproductive healthcare provider training, which aims to improve abortion care access through bias-reduction programs and standardized protocols. Given the influence of policy decisions on state-level maternal mortality reporting standards and recent shifts in federal and state leadership, we highlight the urgent need for community-led initiatives to establish data collection strategies. These grassroots efforts, which operate independently of government funding, are crucial for documenting reliable, timely data on maternal mortality and driving other necessary actions. Future improvements to the CLD could include findings from a broader array of qualitative studies to better understand the unique challenges minority groups face and how they navigate the healthcare system. Through detailing these distinct pathways of access to care in the CLD, we can better meet the specific needs of those overlooked and most affected by restrictive abortion policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54111/001c.137985
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Relationship between Policy and Abortion-Related Maternal Mortality in the United States

Annie Pan, Tom Carpino, A.C.W. Yu, Gurpreet Kaur et al.
Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Assessing the Relationship between Policy and Abortion-Related Maternal Mortality in the United States

Annie Pan, Tom Carpino, A.C.W. Yu, Gurpreet Kaur, Isabelle Jouve, Yue Yu
article en

Abstract

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, the current legal and political landscape surrounding abortion access in the United States has undergone significant transformations, underscoring the urgent need to address factors influencing maternal health outcomes, including restricted abortion access. As a result, this review seeks to illuminate the connections between restrictive abortion policies and maternal health disparities while emphasizing the importance of intersectional factors such as race, gender identity, and socioeconomic status. Our findings identify legal restrictions, healthcare provider bias, and stigma coupled with patient distrust in the healthcare system as three crucial determinants of maternal mortality among individuals seeking abortion care. To structurally visualize the complex interactions of these determinants and other auxiliary variables, we developed a causal loop diagram (CLD), consisting of three reinforcing loops and a central balancing loop suggesting mitigation strategies through comprehensive sexual health education. Another intervention we have proposed involves comprehensive reproductive healthcare provider training, which aims to improve abortion care access through bias-reduction programs and standardized protocols. Given the influence of policy decisions on state-level maternal mortality reporting standards and recent shifts in federal and state leadership, we highlight the urgent need for community-led initiatives to establish data collection strategies. These grassroots efforts, which operate independently of government funding, are crucial for documenting reliable, timely data on maternal mortality and driving other necessary actions. Future improvements to the CLD could include findings from a broader array of qualitative studies to better understand the unique challenges minority groups face and how they navigate the healthcare system. Through detailing these distinct pathways of access to care in the CLD, we can better meet the specific needs of those overlooked and most affected by restrictive abortion policies.

Boston Congress of Public Health Review (BCPHR Formerly HPHR)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.