The Loss of Symbolic Imagination and the Decline of Christian Practice: A Blondelian Perspective

The contemporary decline in Christian church-going and sacramental participation is due in part to the legacy of the Enlightenment, which valorizes the life of the mind over actual practice, a distortion due to a conceptualism of human action, widespread in Western thought, that sees in human action the mere execution of ideas. From here, it is a short step to the willful blindness that restricts our action to the execution of exclusively human ideas and concepts, to the exclusion of the divine, quietly repudiating the claims of orthodox Christian revelation that the divine intention is symbolically realized for us in a true positive revelation of historical particulars (the so-called “scandal of particularity”), including the words of scripture and sacrament. This conceptualism, therefore, fosters the loss of the “symbolic imagination” - our ability or willingness to see God's hand at work through the sensory signs of human experience - in favor of an implicit “doctrine of immanence,” that restricts human action to what human beings can will or desire for themselves, with no reference at all to the divine intention as expressed in the sensory signs of revelation. Without the symbolic imagination, the words of scripture and sacrament are kept within the bounds of what appears reasonable and rational to us, repudiating any true intervention of the divine assistance. This eclipse of “symbolic imagination” is the common cause behind the decline of religious practice, and the resistance to scripture as occasion of grace, as exhibitive words of God, not simply words about God. Ultimately, our interpretation of the “words” of scripture and sacrament, is the symbol in our human finitude for the infinitude of grace, as unmerited gift. As truly revealed, the sensory signs of revealed practice and scripture speak to us something of the divine mind, not merely human ideas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theology Today
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736251385251
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Loss of Symbolic Imagination and the Decline of Christian Practice: A Blondelian Perspective

Cathal Doherty
Theology Today
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

The Loss of Symbolic Imagination and the Decline of Christian Practice: A Blondelian Perspective

Cathal Doherty
article en

Abstract

The contemporary decline in Christian church-going and sacramental participation is due in part to the legacy of the Enlightenment, which valorizes the life of the mind over actual practice, a distortion due to a conceptualism of human action, widespread in Western thought, that sees in human action the mere execution of ideas. From here, it is a short step to the willful blindness that restricts our action to the execution of exclusively human ideas and concepts, to the exclusion of the divine, quietly repudiating the claims of orthodox Christian revelation that the divine intention is symbolically realized for us in a true positive revelation of historical particulars (the so-called “scandal of particularity”), including the words of scripture and sacrament. This conceptualism, therefore, fosters the loss of the “symbolic imagination” - our ability or willingness to see God's hand at work through the sensory signs of human experience - in favor of an implicit “doctrine of immanence,” that restricts human action to what human beings can will or desire for themselves, with no reference at all to the divine intention as expressed in the sensory signs of revelation. Without the symbolic imagination, the words of scripture and sacrament are kept within the bounds of what appears reasonable and rational to us, repudiating any true intervention of the divine assistance. This eclipse of “symbolic imagination” is the common cause behind the decline of religious practice, and the resistance to scripture as occasion of grace, as exhibitive words of God, not simply words about God. Ultimately, our interpretation of the “words” of scripture and sacrament, is the symbol in our human finitude for the infinitude of grace, as unmerited gift. As truly revealed, the sensory signs of revealed practice and scripture speak to us something of the divine mind, not merely human ideas.

Theology TodayVol. 82(4)
Marquette University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Loss of Symbolic Imagination and the Decline of Christian Practice: A Blondelian Perspective — Cathal Doherty · Theology Today (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS