Do children allocated to different methods of complementary feeding introduction have distinct food preferences and flavor acceptance in the first years of life? A randomized clinical trial

This study aimed to analyze the food preferences and flavor acceptance among children allocated to different methods of complementary feeding (CF) introduction in the first years of life. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) involved three distinct groups of children regarding the method of CF introduction: Parent-Led Weaning (PLW); Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS); and Mixed (both PLW and BLISS methods). The intervention occurred at 5.5 months old, and food preferences were analyzed between the ages of 12-35 months using the Food Preferences Questionnaire and the Taste Acceptance Test. The analysis was performed by intention-to-treat, using Pearson's chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test and Poisson regression. A d irected a cyclic g raph (DAG) was used to define the covariates. A total of 140 mother-infant pairs were randomized for the study (PLW n = 45; BLISS: n = 48; and Mixed: n = 47). Of them, 132 completed the Food Preferences Questionnaire, and 92 attended the Taste Acceptance Test. In unadjusted analysis, the prevalence of preferences for foods with a predominant sour taste was higher in the Mixed method compared to the PLW [Crude prevalence ratio (PR): 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03-1.47; p = 0.020]. However, after adjusting for covariates, this association did not remain statistically significant (Adjusted PR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.94-1.41; p = 0.173). There was a significant association between the consumption of the solutions and their respective hedonic reactions in most of the offered tastes (sweet: p < 0.001; sour: p = 0.029; salty: p = 0.005; umami: p = 0.026). In addition, food preferences related to the bitter taste were associated with the higher acceptance of the solution with the same taste in unadjusted analysis (Crude PR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.1-1.25, p = 0.046), but this association did not remain significant in the adjusted analysis (Adjusted PR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.99-1.37; p = 0.069). In conclusion, infants in the Mixed group showed higher sour taste preference than PLW, though not significant after adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335592
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do children allocated to different methods of complementary feeding introduction have distinct food preferences and flavor acceptance in the first years of life? A randomized clinical trial

Rogério Boff Borges, Elma Izze da Silva Magalhães, Leandro Meirelles Nunes, Cátia Regina Ficagna et al.
PLoS ONE
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Do children allocated to different methods of complementary feeding introduction have distinct food preferences and flavor acceptance in the first years of life? A randomized clinical trial

Rogério Boff Borges, Elma Izze da Silva Magalhães, Leandro Meirelles Nunes, Cátia Regina Ficagna, Paula Ruffoni Moreira, Juliana Rombaldi Bernardi, Renata Oliveira Neves, Larissa de Oliveira Silveira, Christy Hannah Sanini Belin
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the food preferences and flavor acceptance among children allocated to different methods of complementary feeding (CF) introduction in the first years of life. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) involved three distinct groups of children regarding the method of CF introduction: Parent-Led Weaning (PLW); Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS); and Mixed (both PLW and BLISS methods). The intervention occurred at 5.5 months old, and food preferences were analyzed between the ages of 12-35 months using the Food Preferences Questionnaire and the Taste Acceptance Test. The analysis was performed by intention-to-treat, using Pearson's chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test and Poisson regression. A d irected a cyclic g raph (DAG) was used to define the covariates. A total of 140 mother-infant pairs were randomized for the study (PLW n = 45; BLISS: n = 48; and Mixed: n = 47). Of them, 132 completed the Food Preferences Questionnaire, and 92 attended the Taste Acceptance Test. In unadjusted analysis, the prevalence of preferences for foods with a predominant sour taste was higher in the Mixed method compared to the PLW [Crude prevalence ratio (PR): 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03-1.47; p = 0.020]. However, after adjusting for covariates, this association did not remain statistically significant (Adjusted PR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.94-1.41; p = 0.173). There was a significant association between the consumption of the solutions and their respective hedonic reactions in most of the offered tastes (sweet: p < 0.001; sour: p = 0.029; salty: p = 0.005; umami: p = 0.026). In addition, food preferences related to the bitter taste were associated with the higher acceptance of the solution with the same taste in unadjusted analysis (Crude PR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.1-1.25, p = 0.046), but this association did not remain significant in the adjusted analysis (Adjusted PR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.99-1.37; p = 0.069). In conclusion, infants in the Mixed group showed higher sour taste preference than PLW, though not significant after adjustment.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(11)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade Luterana do Brasil (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.