Toward a Neoliberal Regime of Belonging?: Rethinking Contemporary Statelessness Governance in Thailand

Critical migration scholars have noted the rise of neoliberalization of immigration and citizenship policies in the Global North, where citizenship is increasingly reconceptualized not as a right, but a privilege to be earned or a commodity to be “purchased.” However, this literature is in sufficiently explored in relation to statelessness governance and in the Global South contexts. This article examines the shift in the Thai state's governance of statelessness in the last two decades through the lens of neoliberal citizenship and belonging. Drawing on policy analysis and long-term ethnographic research in northern Thailand, I argue that what emerges in place of a previous regime of total exclusion and marginalization of ethnic “other” is a new regime of belonging that operates simultaneously on two levels. Firstly, neoliberal citizenship logics (such as contributions through financial and human capital, citizenship-as-investment, self-responsibilitization, deservedness and earned citizenship) are becoming central to mediating legal status for stateless persons. In particular, educated stateless youth, who are “products” of the Thai educational system, have come to understand citizenship in these terms. Secondly, immigration policies and related registration practices continue to create and sustain temporariness and precarity for labor migrants and their children. My preliminary findings suggest that a neoliberal regime of belonging has resulted in a new hierarchy among stateless persons—those with higher social and cultural capital are more likely to successfully navigate their way out of legal precarity. As a result of this regime of stratified belonging, I observe that statelessness in Thailand will not likely be eradicated despite the Thai state's public commitments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration Review
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251390567
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Neoliberal Regime of Belonging?: Rethinking Contemporary Statelessness Governance in Thailand

Janepicha Cheva-Isarakul
International Migration Review
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Toward a Neoliberal Regime of Belonging?: Rethinking Contemporary Statelessness Governance in Thailand

Janepicha Cheva-Isarakul
article en

Abstract

Critical migration scholars have noted the rise of neoliberalization of immigration and citizenship policies in the Global North, where citizenship is increasingly reconceptualized not as a right, but a privilege to be earned or a commodity to be “purchased.” However, this literature is in sufficiently explored in relation to statelessness governance and in the Global South contexts. This article examines the shift in the Thai state's governance of statelessness in the last two decades through the lens of neoliberal citizenship and belonging. Drawing on policy analysis and long-term ethnographic research in northern Thailand, I argue that what emerges in place of a previous regime of total exclusion and marginalization of ethnic “other” is a new regime of belonging that operates simultaneously on two levels. Firstly, neoliberal citizenship logics (such as contributions through financial and human capital, citizenship-as-investment, self-responsibilitization, deservedness and earned citizenship) are becoming central to mediating legal status for stateless persons. In particular, educated stateless youth, who are “products” of the Thai educational system, have come to understand citizenship in these terms. Secondly, immigration policies and related registration practices continue to create and sustain temporariness and precarity for labor migrants and their children. My preliminary findings suggest that a neoliberal regime of belonging has resulted in a new hierarchy among stateless persons—those with higher social and cultural capital are more likely to successfully navigate their way out of legal precarity. As a result of this regime of stratified belonging, I observe that statelessness in Thailand will not likely be eradicated despite the Thai state's public commitments.

International Migration Review
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.