How Well Does ChatGPT-4o Reason? Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Performance in Hand Surgery

<b>Background:</b> The application of large language model (LLM) in surgical decision-making is rapidly expanding, yet its potential in hand and peripheral nerve surgery remains largely unexplored. This study assessed the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of a large language model (ChatGPT-4o) in scenarios characterized by multiple valid management strategies and absent expert consensus. <b>Methods:</b> Three representative cases-thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) arthritis, scaphoid nonunion, and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)-were developed to reflect frequent conditions in hand surgery with competing but accepted treatment options. Each case was submitted to ChatGPT-4o using a standardized prompt. LLM-generated responses were evaluated by 52 participants (34 board-certified hand surgeons and 18 residents) across diagnostic accuracy, clinical relevance, and completeness. Readability indices, including Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, were analyzed to assess appropriateness for a medical audience. <b>Results:</b> ChatGPT-4o demonstrated coherent but limited diagnostic accuracy (mean 2.9 ± 1.2 SD), moderate clinical relevance (3.5 ± 1.0 SD), and slightly higher completeness (3.4 ± 1.1 SD). Performance was strongest in the standardized scenario (carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS) and weakest in individualized reasoning (CMC I arthritis). No significant differences were observed between experts and residents (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In higher-level reasoning, ChatGPT-4o performed best in CTS and weakest in CMC I arthritis. Readability confirmed professional-level language (mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 16.4). <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT-4o shows promise as a supportive tool for diagnostic reasoning and surgical education, particularly where standardized frameworks exist. Its limitations in ambiguous scenarios highlight the ongoing need for expert oversight. Future large language model development should emphasize specialty-specific training and context-aware reasoning to enhance their role in surgical decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228045
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Well Does ChatGPT-4o Reason? Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Performance in Hand Surgery

Valeria Rinaldi, Esther Vögelin, Yves Harder, Laura De Pellegrin et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

How Well Does ChatGPT-4o Reason? Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Performance in Hand Surgery

Valeria Rinaldi, Esther Vögelin, Yves Harder, Laura De Pellegrin, Léna G. Dietrich, Esin Rothenfluh
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The application of large language model (LLM) in surgical decision-making is rapidly expanding, yet its potential in hand and peripheral nerve surgery remains largely unexplored. This study assessed the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of a large language model (ChatGPT-4o) in scenarios characterized by multiple valid management strategies and absent expert consensus. <b>Methods:</b> Three representative cases-thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) arthritis, scaphoid nonunion, and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)-were developed to reflect frequent conditions in hand surgery with competing but accepted treatment options. Each case was submitted to ChatGPT-4o using a standardized prompt. LLM-generated responses were evaluated by 52 participants (34 board-certified hand surgeons and 18 residents) across diagnostic accuracy, clinical relevance, and completeness. Readability indices, including Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, were analyzed to assess appropriateness for a medical audience. <b>Results:</b> ChatGPT-4o demonstrated coherent but limited diagnostic accuracy (mean 2.9 ± 1.2 SD), moderate clinical relevance (3.5 ± 1.0 SD), and slightly higher completeness (3.4 ± 1.1 SD). Performance was strongest in the standardized scenario (carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS) and weakest in individualized reasoning (CMC I arthritis). No significant differences were observed between experts and residents (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In higher-level reasoning, ChatGPT-4o performed best in CTS and weakest in CMC I arthritis. Readability confirmed professional-level language (mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 16.4). <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT-4o shows promise as a supportive tool for diagnostic reasoning and surgical education, particularly where standardized frameworks exist. Its limitations in ambiguous scenarios highlight the ongoing need for expert oversight. Future large language model development should emphasize specialty-specific training and context-aware reasoning to enhance their role in surgical decision support.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(22)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.