Cost-Effective Perspective of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Under Different Curing Regimes

Composite geopolymer concrete (CGPC), is receiving growing attention in the construction sector for its sustainable nature, environmental benefits, and its valuable role in promoting efficient waste utilization. The strategic incorporation of reinforcing fibers into geopolymer concrete (GPC) matrices is critical for enhancing mechanical performance and meeting the durability requirements of high-performance construction applications. Although substantial research has focused on strength enhancement of fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FGPC) individually, it has neglected practical considerations such as energy use for curing and life-cycle assessments. Thus, this study investigates the cost-effective aspects of FGPC cured under different regimes. Different cementitious binders were incorporated, i.e., fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), in addition to alkaline activators (a combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate), hooked-end steel fibers (HESFs), basalt fibers (BFs), and polypropylene fibers (PPFs), as well as aggregates (gravel and sand). The effect of different geopolymer-based materials, reinforcing fibers, and different curing regimes on the mechanical, durability, and economic performance were analyzed. Results showed that the applied thermal curing regimes (oven curing or steam curing) had a considerable impact on durability performance, compressive strength, and flexural strength development, especially for GPC mixes involving high FA content. Cost analysis outcomes suggested that the most affordable option is GPCM1 (100% FA without fibers), but it demonstrates low strength under ambient curing conditions; RGCM4 (100% GGBS and 0.75% HESF) provided the best strength and durability option but at higher material cost; RGCM7 (50% FA, 50% GGBS, and 0.75% HSF) exhibited a balanced choice since it offer satisfied strength and durability performance with moderate cost compared to other options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction Materials
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater5040081
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Effective Perspective of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Under Different Curing Regimes

Sarah Al-Qutaifi, Raizal S.M. Rashid, Atared Salah Kawoosh
Construction Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Cost-Effective Perspective of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Under Different Curing Regimes

Sarah Al-Qutaifi, Raizal S.M. Rashid, Atared Salah Kawoosh
article en

Abstract

Composite geopolymer concrete (CGPC), is receiving growing attention in the construction sector for its sustainable nature, environmental benefits, and its valuable role in promoting efficient waste utilization. The strategic incorporation of reinforcing fibers into geopolymer concrete (GPC) matrices is critical for enhancing mechanical performance and meeting the durability requirements of high-performance construction applications. Although substantial research has focused on strength enhancement of fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FGPC) individually, it has neglected practical considerations such as energy use for curing and life-cycle assessments. Thus, this study investigates the cost-effective aspects of FGPC cured under different regimes. Different cementitious binders were incorporated, i.e., fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), in addition to alkaline activators (a combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate), hooked-end steel fibers (HESFs), basalt fibers (BFs), and polypropylene fibers (PPFs), as well as aggregates (gravel and sand). The effect of different geopolymer-based materials, reinforcing fibers, and different curing regimes on the mechanical, durability, and economic performance were analyzed. Results showed that the applied thermal curing regimes (oven curing or steam curing) had a considerable impact on durability performance, compressive strength, and flexural strength development, especially for GPC mixes involving high FA content. Cost analysis outcomes suggested that the most affordable option is GPCM1 (100% FA without fibers), but it demonstrates low strength under ambient curing conditions; RGCM4 (100% GGBS and 0.75% HESF) provided the best strength and durability option but at higher material cost; RGCM7 (50% FA, 50% GGBS, and 0.75% HSF) exhibited a balanced choice since it offer satisfied strength and durability performance with moderate cost compared to other options.

Construction MaterialsVol. 5(4)
Thi Qar University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.