Validation of a two-item short form of the perceived health competence scale

Perceived health competence is a construct encompassing individuals’ confidence in managing their health and health-related behaviors. The 8-item Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS-8), developed to measure this construct, has established psychometric properties including test-retest reliability and predictive validity for health behaviors and clinical outcomes. We aimed to validate the 2-item Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS-2), an abbreviated version of the PHCS-8, for use in clinical and research settings where respondent burden is a primary concern. We conducted a psychometric validation study using pooled data from 482 participants across two cohort studies conducted in an integrative medicine clinic. Participants completed the PHCS-8, PROMIS Global Health Scale (yielding physical and mental health T-scores), Socially Desirable Response Set Five-Item Survey (SDRS-5), and sociodemographic information. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency reliability, exploratory factorial validity analysis, Bland-Altman analysis of instrument agreement, convergent validity through correlation analysis, and known-groups validity across demographic and health status subgroups. Study participants had a mean age of 51 years (SD = 13.2), were 81% female, and predominantly college-educated (86%). The PHCS-2 demonstrated appropriate response distributions with optimal inter-item correlation (r = 0.31) and factorial validity (factor loadings: 0.569, 0.522). Criterion validity was supported by strong correlation with the PHCS-8 (r = 0.80) and minimal systematic bias in Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference = 0.032, 95% limits: -0.792 to 0.856). Convergent validity was demonstrated through moderate correlations with PROMIS physical health (r = 0.463) and mental health (r = 0.391) T-scores. Known-groups validity was confirmed by significant differences between individuals with above-average versus below-average physical health (Cohen’s d = 0.92) and mental health (Cohen’s d = 0.62). Discriminant validity was supported by no significant correlation with social desirability (SDRS-5, r = 0.013, p > 0.05). The PHCS-2 represents a psychometrically sound, brief measure of perceived health competence that maintains strong concordance with the full PHCS-8 while substantially reducing respondent burden. This validated instrument provides an efficient clinical screening method to identify patients with lower perceived health competence who may benefit from targeted self-management support interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00963-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a two-item short form of the perceived health competence scale

Sunil B. Kripalani, Hayden B. Bosworth, Gurjeet S. Birdee, Kenneth E. Freedland et al.
1 citations
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Health and Wellbeing Research
2.82
article

Validation of a two-item short form of the perceived health competence scale

Sunil B. Kripalani, Hayden B. Bosworth, Gurjeet S. Birdee, Kenneth E. Freedland, Jacquelyn S. Pennings, Justin M. Bachmann, Elisa J. Gordon, Devika Nair
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perceived health competence is a construct encompassing individuals’ confidence in managing their health and health-related behaviors. The 8-item Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS-8), developed to measure this construct, has established psychometric properties including test-retest reliability and predictive validity for health behaviors and clinical outcomes. We aimed to validate the 2-item Perceived Health Competence Scale (PHCS-2), an abbreviated version of the PHCS-8, for use in clinical and research settings where respondent burden is a primary concern. We conducted a psychometric validation study using pooled data from 482 participants across two cohort studies conducted in an integrative medicine clinic. Participants completed the PHCS-8, PROMIS Global Health Scale (yielding physical and mental health T-scores), Socially Desirable Response Set Five-Item Survey (SDRS-5), and sociodemographic information. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency reliability, exploratory factorial validity analysis, Bland-Altman analysis of instrument agreement, convergent validity through correlation analysis, and known-groups validity across demographic and health status subgroups. Study participants had a mean age of 51 years (SD = 13.2), were 81% female, and predominantly college-educated (86%). The PHCS-2 demonstrated appropriate response distributions with optimal inter-item correlation (r = 0.31) and factorial validity (factor loadings: 0.569, 0.522). Criterion validity was supported by strong correlation with the PHCS-8 (r = 0.80) and minimal systematic bias in Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference = 0.032, 95% limits: -0.792 to 0.856). Convergent validity was demonstrated through moderate correlations with PROMIS physical health (r = 0.463) and mental health (r = 0.391) T-scores. Known-groups validity was confirmed by significant differences between individuals with above-average versus below-average physical health (Cohen’s d = 0.92) and mental health (Cohen’s d = 0.62). Discriminant validity was supported by no significant correlation with social desirability (SDRS-5, r = 0.013, p > 0.05). The PHCS-2 represents a psychometrically sound, brief measure of perceived health competence that maintains strong concordance with the full PHCS-8 while substantially reducing respondent burden. This validated instrument provides an efficient clinical screening method to identify patients with lower perceived health competence who may benefit from targeted self-management support interventions.

Journal of Patient-Reported OutcomesVol. 9(1)
Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health and Wellbeing Research
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.