Truth beliefs can be evaluatively conditioned

Laypersons can often predict effects studied in psychological research. Corneille and Béna (2023) noted that this questions the boundaries between scientific and folk psychological knowledge and suggested that new psychological phenomena may be discovered by directly asking non-experts about treatment effects: a more inclusive and collaborative approach to psychological science. Here, we followed upon that suggestion. In Study 1, non-experts (N = 125) predicted higher truth ratings for trivia previously paired with positive than negative pictures. Consistent with Study 1’s predictions, this “Truth Beliefs Conditioning" effect was observed in Study 3 (N = 186), which overcame two limitations of Study 2 (N = 187), in which the effect was not significant. This supports our claim that folk mental representations about treatment effects can be usefully probed for discovering new psychological phenomena. Future research should investigate the generalizability of this approach and test the mechanisms underlying truth beliefs conditioning.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7a6qb_v1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Truth beliefs can be evaluatively conditioned

Chloé Fournier Bernard, Olivier Corneille, Jérémy Béna, Mayan Navon
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Truth beliefs can be evaluatively conditioned

Chloé Fournier Bernard, Olivier Corneille, Jérémy Béna, Mayan Navon
article en

Abstract

Laypersons can often predict effects studied in psychological research. Corneille and Béna (2023) noted that this questions the boundaries between scientific and folk psychological knowledge and suggested that new psychological phenomena may be discovered by directly asking non-experts about treatment effects: a more inclusive and collaborative approach to psychological science. Here, we followed upon that suggestion. In Study 1, non-experts (N = 125) predicted higher truth ratings for trivia previously paired with positive than negative pictures. Consistent with Study 1’s predictions, this “Truth Beliefs Conditioning" effect was observed in Study 3 (N = 186), which overcame two limitations of Study 2 (N = 187), in which the effect was not significant. This supports our claim that folk mental representations about treatment effects can be usefully probed for discovering new psychological phenomena. Future research should investigate the generalizability of this approach and test the mechanisms underlying truth beliefs conditioning.

Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.