A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
Decision-making based on deliberation among committee members should be supported over the use of scoring approaches. Additionally, making ethical decisions on a case-by-case basis is preferable to accuracy, which may not be realistically practicable.
Authors
- Jens Gaab (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-8491)
- Lester Darryl Geneviève
- Rosa Maria Cajiga Morales (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-4888)
- David Mawufemor Azilagbetor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-639X)
- David Shaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8180-6927)
- Bernice Simone Elger
Institutions
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- Capital District Health Authority (CA)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University Centre of Legal Medicine (CH)
- Université Laval (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01297-z
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.35
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Universität Basel
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung