A Three-Factor Experimental Study on the Effect of Specimen Size on the Shear Strength of Rock Joints

Abstract Shearing of rock joints is a critical failure mode in rock masses. The shear strength of rock joints must, therefore, be considered in the design of structures in rock masses. Several criteria for prediction of shear strength have been proposed over the years. However, the possible effect of scale on shear strength is an issue. One possible reason for this is that previous experimental studies on the scale effect contain various sources of uncertainties (mixed test methods, multiple testing of same specimen, application of results to other materials than tested, and omitted handling of statistical dispersion). In this paper, the results from a uniquely comprehensive experimental laboratory program, that handles these uncertainties and also extends the range of previously tested conditions, is presented. 46 direct shear tests on two joint types, natural and tensile induced granite rock joints, have been performed under the constant normal stress and the constant normal stiffness boundary condition at 5 MPa initial normal stress applied over three specimen sizes (35 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 60 mm, 70 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 100 mm and 300 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 500 mm). Analysis of variance shows no effect of the specimen size on the shear strength, whereas the joint type and boundary condition has. Quantitative estimates of the influence of the joint type and boundary condition on the shear strength are presented. A consistent approach for determination of shear strength from the point of time associated with a shear stiffness change of the test system is also presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04954-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Three-Factor Experimental Study on the Effect of Specimen Size on the Shear Strength of Rock Joints

Erland Johnson, Mathias Flansbjer, Diego Mas Ivars, J. Larsson et al.
1 citations
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
article

A Three-Factor Experimental Study on the Effect of Specimen Size on the Shear Strength of Rock Joints

Erland Johnson, Mathias Flansbjer, Diego Mas Ivars, J. Larsson, Fredrik Johansson, Ignacio Pérez–Rey, Lars Jacobsson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Shearing of rock joints is a critical failure mode in rock masses. The shear strength of rock joints must, therefore, be considered in the design of structures in rock masses. Several criteria for prediction of shear strength have been proposed over the years. However, the possible effect of scale on shear strength is an issue. One possible reason for this is that previous experimental studies on the scale effect contain various sources of uncertainties (mixed test methods, multiple testing of same specimen, application of results to other materials than tested, and omitted handling of statistical dispersion). In this paper, the results from a uniquely comprehensive experimental laboratory program, that handles these uncertainties and also extends the range of previously tested conditions, is presented. 46 direct shear tests on two joint types, natural and tensile induced granite rock joints, have been performed under the constant normal stress and the constant normal stiffness boundary condition at 5 MPa initial normal stress applied over three specimen sizes (35 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 60 mm, 70 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 100 mm and 300 mm $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 500 mm). Analysis of variance shows no effect of the specimen size on the shear strength, whereas the joint type and boundary condition has. Quantitative estimates of the influence of the joint type and boundary condition on the shear strength are presented. A consistent approach for determination of shear strength from the point of time associated with a shear stiffness change of the test system is also presented.

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.