Designing heat exchanger using EDTR method and python as a computational tool

Abstract This research paper delves into designing heat exchangers using a user-friendly and robust GUI-based program developed using Python as a computational tool. In addition, various design methods such as LMTD and EDTR have been used, including the Kern and Bell-Delaware methods. The results showed that the EDTR method is a promising alternative design tool compared to traditional ones. This comparative analysis highlights the accuracy, efficiency, and potential advantages of the EDTR method in contrast to the LMTD approach. Complex, iterative, and time-intensive manual calculation challenges were mitigated using Python programming. This computational approach significantly streamlined the calculation process and reduced the required time and effort, ensuring precise and reliable results. The study demonstrated the potential of the EDTR method as an efficient and accurate alternative to the traditional LMTD approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2025-0013
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing heat exchanger using EDTR method and python as a computational tool

Raj Kumar Arya, Prakash J. Singh, Amit K. Thakur, George D. Verros et al.
International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

Designing heat exchanger using EDTR method and python as a computational tool

Raj Kumar Arya, Prakash J. Singh, Amit K. Thakur, George D. Verros, M. N. Waghmare, Harsh Maheshwari, Mina Malekzadeh, Devyani Thapliyal, PK Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract This research paper delves into designing heat exchangers using a user-friendly and robust GUI-based program developed using Python as a computational tool. In addition, various design methods such as LMTD and EDTR have been used, including the Kern and Bell-Delaware methods. The results showed that the EDTR method is a promising alternative design tool compared to traditional ones. This comparative analysis highlights the accuracy, efficiency, and potential advantages of the EDTR method in contrast to the LMTD approach. Complex, iterative, and time-intensive manual calculation challenges were mitigated using Python programming. This computational approach significantly streamlined the calculation process and reduced the required time and effort, ensuring precise and reliable results. The study demonstrated the potential of the EDTR method as an efficient and accurate alternative to the traditional LMTD approach.

International Journal of Chemical Reactor EngineeringVol. 23(11)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (IN), Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.