Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review

Peer support, grounded in lived experiences, plays an important role in advancing recovery-oriented mental healthcare. Although widely implemented in community settings, its adoption in acute psychiatric inpatient care remains limited because of structural and cultural factors that constrain recovery-oriented practices. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings, focusing on (1) implementation formats, (2) peer roles, and (3) facilitators and challenges. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a scoping review using the participants, concepts, and context framework. We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases. We included studies that involved individuals with mental health conditions, described peer support provided by persons with lived experiences, and were conducted in acute psychiatric inpatient settings. Eleven studies, published between 1995 and 2024, met the inclusion criteria. Peer support was reported as being implemented through informal and structured formats that vary in frequency, continuity, and delivery contexts. Peer roles included emotional, practical, advocacy, and relational support. The reported benefits include increased activity participation, emotional reassurance, social engagement, and recovery-related gains for both patients and peer workers. Facilitators include training, supervision, leadership support, and collaborative relationships with staff. The reported challenges include unclear role boundaries, staff resistance, emotional strain, and structural limitations, including space, resources, and barriers to team integration. The findings suggest that peer support may help promote recovery-oriented practices in acute psychiatric settings, although further rigorous studies are needed to confirm its impact and inform sustainable integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review

Suguru Shimokihara, Miki Yamashita, Michio Maruta, Akira Imamura et al.
1 citations
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
article

Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review

Suguru Shimokihara, Miki Yamashita, Michio Maruta, Akira Imamura, Goro Tanaka, Gwanghee Han, Terunaga Kawano, Kohgaku Eguchi, Toshio Higashi, Daiki Yamazono, Yuri Onomichi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Peer support, grounded in lived experiences, plays an important role in advancing recovery-oriented mental healthcare. Although widely implemented in community settings, its adoption in acute psychiatric inpatient care remains limited because of structural and cultural factors that constrain recovery-oriented practices. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings, focusing on (1) implementation formats, (2) peer roles, and (3) facilitators and challenges. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a scoping review using the participants, concepts, and context framework. We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases. We included studies that involved individuals with mental health conditions, described peer support provided by persons with lived experiences, and were conducted in acute psychiatric inpatient settings. Eleven studies, published between 1995 and 2024, met the inclusion criteria. Peer support was reported as being implemented through informal and structured formats that vary in frequency, continuity, and delivery contexts. Peer roles included emotional, practical, advocacy, and relational support. The reported benefits include increased activity participation, emotional reassurance, social engagement, and recovery-related gains for both patients and peer workers. Facilitators include training, supervision, leadership support, and collaborative relationships with staff. The reported challenges include unclear role boundaries, staff resistance, emotional strain, and structural limitations, including space, resources, and barriers to team integration. The findings suggest that peer support may help promote recovery-oriented practices in acute psychiatric settings, although further rigorous studies are needed to confirm its impact and inform sustainable integration.

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences ReportsVol. 4(4)
University of Nagasaki (JP), Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science (JP), Fukuoka International University (JP), Nagasaki University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.