The Science of Blackness: Biology and Social Science in Black-Focused Scholarship, 1900–2020

In recent years, scholars have argued that biological ideas about Black people have returned to both the biomedical and social sciences. In this article, we extend such research by broadening its scope across time and disciplinary space, examining—through citation network, semantic, and qualitative content analyses—more than 50,000 articles about Black people in scholarly journals between 1900 and 2020. In so doing, we make two core contributions. First, we identify the mid-twentieth century as the highwater mark for social scientific thinking about Blackness, and show how deeply connected this thinking was to the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) in which it was produced. Second, we demonstrate the ways in which the recent “return” of biological ideas about Black people differs from the accounts against which mid-twentieth-century social scientists argued. Compared to the early twentieth century, the line between biological and social scientific accounts of Black people has been blurred, making accounts in both at once less overtly racist and also potentially more difficult to challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492251384914
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Science of Blackness: Biology and Social Science in Black-Focused Scholarship, 1900–2020

Adam Reich, Elizabeth Adetiba
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

The Science of Blackness: Biology and Social Science in Black-Focused Scholarship, 1900–2020

Adam Reich, Elizabeth Adetiba
article en

Abstract

In recent years, scholars have argued that biological ideas about Black people have returned to both the biomedical and social sciences. In this article, we extend such research by broadening its scope across time and disciplinary space, examining—through citation network, semantic, and qualitative content analyses—more than 50,000 articles about Black people in scholarly journals between 1900 and 2020. In so doing, we make two core contributions. First, we identify the mid-twentieth century as the highwater mark for social scientific thinking about Blackness, and show how deeply connected this thinking was to the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) in which it was produced. Second, we demonstrate the ways in which the recent “return” of biological ideas about Black people differs from the accounts against which mid-twentieth-century social scientists argued. Compared to the early twentieth century, the line between biological and social scientific accounts of Black people has been blurred, making accounts in both at once less overtly racist and also potentially more difficult to challenge.

Sociology of Race and EthnicityVol. 12(2)
University of Rochester (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Science of Blackness: Biology and Social Science in Black-Focused Scholarship, 1900–2020 — Adam Reich, Elizabeth Adetiba · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS