OA2077. Accident characteristics that often result in long-term consequences of road users

Abstract Background Road traffic incidents often have sudden and life-changing effects, including reduced productivity, and long-term dependence in daily life. Addressing long-term consequences (LTC) is therefore a key challenge in creating a resilient road transport system. The EU project ProtAct-Us aims to improve the collection of data on physical and cognitive outcomes, and to develop countermeasures and assessment tools that consider accident and injury statistics, including LTCs. Methods To identify use cases that frequently result in LTCs, an analysis was carried out using accident data from the MHH Accident Research Unit (295 cases) and the EU-funded REHABIL-AID project (60 cases). Both databases contain general accident information recorded at the time of the incident, as well as follow-up data on LTCs. This includes information related to pain, reduced mobility, physical, psychological, or social impairments. Results For different types of road users different factors result in higher rates of long-term consequences. For example, car occupants with LTC are often in frontal and rear—end impact scenarios with another car, having injured the thorax, head, neck and lower extremities. While cyclists with long-term consequences are often in single-vehicle accidents or in collisions at junctions with cars with frontal or front-lateral impacts. Here injuries to the upper or lower extremities were most common. Conclusion The analysis of accident data revealed that certain accident types and injured body regions are more likely to lead to long-term consequences. These are not always linked to injury severity and can also psychologically affect uninjured individuals. Based on this information the development of tools and measures will be conducted to reduce such outcomes. Key messages Persons with long-term consequences have specific accident characteristics that differ from those of severe injuries, and they are specific to the different types of road users. Key messages • Persons with long-term consequences have specific accident characteristics that differ from those of severe injuries. • Long-term consequences are specific to the different types of road users. Topic Long-term consequences, traffic accidents, injury outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf165.090
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OA2077. Accident characteristics that often result in long-term consequences of road users

Michael Jänsch, Julia Prinz, H Johannsen, Caroline Deck et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Traffic and Road Safety
article

OA2077. Accident characteristics that often result in long-term consequences of road users

Michael Jänsch, Julia Prinz, H Johannsen, Caroline Deck, Johannes Becker, Werner Leitgeb, Cornel Klein, Maria Papadakaki, Ottavia Eleonora Ferraro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Road traffic incidents often have sudden and life-changing effects, including reduced productivity, and long-term dependence in daily life. Addressing long-term consequences (LTC) is therefore a key challenge in creating a resilient road transport system. The EU project ProtAct-Us aims to improve the collection of data on physical and cognitive outcomes, and to develop countermeasures and assessment tools that consider accident and injury statistics, including LTCs. Methods To identify use cases that frequently result in LTCs, an analysis was carried out using accident data from the MHH Accident Research Unit (295 cases) and the EU-funded REHABIL-AID project (60 cases). Both databases contain general accident information recorded at the time of the incident, as well as follow-up data on LTCs. This includes information related to pain, reduced mobility, physical, psychological, or social impairments. Results For different types of road users different factors result in higher rates of long-term consequences. For example, car occupants with LTC are often in frontal and rear—end impact scenarios with another car, having injured the thorax, head, neck and lower extremities. While cyclists with long-term consequences are often in single-vehicle accidents or in collisions at junctions with cars with frontal or front-lateral impacts. Here injuries to the upper or lower extremities were most common. Conclusion The analysis of accident data revealed that certain accident types and injured body regions are more likely to lead to long-term consequences. These are not always linked to injury severity and can also psychologically affect uninjured individuals. Based on this information the development of tools and measures will be conducted to reduce such outcomes. Key messages Persons with long-term consequences have specific accident characteristics that differ from those of severe injuries, and they are specific to the different types of road users. Key messages • Persons with long-term consequences have specific accident characteristics that differ from those of severe injuries. • Long-term consequences are specific to the different types of road users. Topic Long-term consequences, traffic accidents, injury outcome.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_5)
University of Pavia (IT), Mediterranean University (ME), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH (Austria) (AT), Université de Strasbourg (FR), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.