PA20101. A single-center study in Greece on the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy

Abstract Background To assess the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open cholecystectomy in Greece. Methods A single-center, prospective study was conducted for a one year’s period. In total, 58 consecutive patients were recruited and the collected baseline data includes socio-demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics, as well as medical history. The mean cost of each procedure was estimated using the micro-costing method and the bottom-up approach, from the insurance provider perspective. Results In total, 58 patients were subjected to cholecystectomy, of which 46 to laparoscopic (17 males, 29 female) and 12 open to cholecystectomy (8 males, 4 female), between January- December 2021. The mean age of the patients for the laparoscopic and open procedures was 59.48 years ± 13.525 and 74.75 years ± 17.02, respectively, (p = 0.002). The mean (95% CI) total (direct) surgical cost (including human resources, medication, medical supplies and electricity consumption) for patients subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy was estimated at €728.96 (€669.99–€787.93), whereas for patients undergoing the open procedure it was estimated at €445.64 (€388.40–€502.87), (p = 0.162). The mean length of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery was 2.04 days (range: 1-6 days), and for open surgery 7.92 (range: 2-22 days), (p < 0.001). Considering the duration of hospitalization as a measure of effectiveness, the laparoscopic procedure was found to be more cost effective than the open method, with an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio, (ICER) = −€48.18/day. Conclusions The data revealed that although procedure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a relatively high direct surgical cost, with medical supplies contributing the most, it is more cost effectiveness compared to open cholecystectomy. Key messages • Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (2.04 days) compared to those undergoing open cholecystectomy (7.92 days) (p < 0.001) • Despite the higher direct surgical cost, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more cost-effective due to the shorter hospital stay, with an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of - €48.18 per day. Topic Cost effectiveness, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf165.127
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PA20101. A single-center study in Greece on the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy

Christos Ntais, Nick Kontodimopoulos, John Fanourgiakis, E. Kanoupakis et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

PA20101. A single-center study in Greece on the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy

Christos Ntais, Nick Kontodimopoulos, John Fanourgiakis, E. Kanoupakis, Ι Dimotikalis, I Lionta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To assess the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open cholecystectomy in Greece. Methods A single-center, prospective study was conducted for a one year’s period. In total, 58 consecutive patients were recruited and the collected baseline data includes socio-demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics, as well as medical history. The mean cost of each procedure was estimated using the micro-costing method and the bottom-up approach, from the insurance provider perspective. Results In total, 58 patients were subjected to cholecystectomy, of which 46 to laparoscopic (17 males, 29 female) and 12 open to cholecystectomy (8 males, 4 female), between January- December 2021. The mean age of the patients for the laparoscopic and open procedures was 59.48 years ± 13.525 and 74.75 years ± 17.02, respectively, (p = 0.002). The mean (95% CI) total (direct) surgical cost (including human resources, medication, medical supplies and electricity consumption) for patients subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy was estimated at €728.96 (€669.99–€787.93), whereas for patients undergoing the open procedure it was estimated at €445.64 (€388.40–€502.87), (p = 0.162). The mean length of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery was 2.04 days (range: 1-6 days), and for open surgery 7.92 (range: 2-22 days), (p < 0.001). Considering the duration of hospitalization as a measure of effectiveness, the laparoscopic procedure was found to be more cost effective than the open method, with an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio, (ICER) = −€48.18/day. Conclusions The data revealed that although procedure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a relatively high direct surgical cost, with medical supplies contributing the most, it is more cost effectiveness compared to open cholecystectomy. Key messages • Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (2.04 days) compared to those undergoing open cholecystectomy (7.92 days) (p < 0.001) • Despite the higher direct surgical cost, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more cost-effective due to the shorter hospital stay, with an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of - €48.18 per day. Topic Cost effectiveness, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_5)
Hellenic Open University (GR), Mediterranean University (ME), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), University Hospital of Heraklion (GR), Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.