OA2012. Self-harm recidivism prediction with a gradient boosting ML approach on the European Injury Database

Abstract Background Predicting intentional self-harm recidivism is critical for reducing preventable mortality and optimizing resource allocation in mental healthcare. While existing risk assessment tools rely on clinician-reported factors, machine learning offers data-driven insights into underrecognized predictors. Methods We developed an XGBoost gradient boosting model using 7,375 records from the EU-IDB Full Dataset (41.7% with intentional self-harm recidivism), employing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to identify key predictors. The model was optimized via dynamic threshold adjustment (optimal threshold: 0.3479). SHAP values are shown for each feature. Results The model demonstrated excellent accuracy: precision 0.78, recall 0.78 and an F1-score of 0.78, with an AUC 0.86. SHAP analysis revealed critical drivers of recurrence: Mechanism of injury (0.58), Activity when injured (0.33), and Object involved (0.29). Among the most impactful modalities by feature were: Mechanism of injury (foreign body 1.01, exposure to chemical or other substance 0.84); Activity when injured (other specified leisure or play 0.47, unspecified leisure or play 0.43); Object involved (personal grooming utensil 0.81 e.g. razor, razor blade and sedatives or antipsychotics 0.53). Although Age showed a moderate overall importance (0.20), individual-level analysis highlighted a subset of patients aged 46-62 years with significantly elevated SHAP values (up to 0.77). Temporal features such as the COVID-19 period had limited impact (0.06), indicating that pandemic effects were secondary to clinical and situational factors. Conclusions The model’s high accuracy (AUC 86%) supports its potential as a screening tool in emergency departments, a prioritization system for follow-up care, and a template for prevention programs. Future research should validate these findings across diverse healthcare systems. Key messages • Machine learning model predicts self-harm recidivism with high accuracy identifying key risk factors. • Key predictors are mechanism of injury, activity during injury, and objects involved, more than demographic factors. Topic Self-harm injury, Risk prediction, SHAP analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf165.112
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OA2012. Self-harm recidivism prediction with a gradient boosting ML approach on the European Injury Database

Alessio Pitidis, Arianna Carannante, Marco Giustini, G Fondi et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

OA2012. Self-harm recidivism prediction with a gradient boosting ML approach on the European Injury Database

Alessio Pitidis, Arianna Carannante, Marco Giustini, G Fondi, Rafał Halik, M Louyot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Predicting intentional self-harm recidivism is critical for reducing preventable mortality and optimizing resource allocation in mental healthcare. While existing risk assessment tools rely on clinician-reported factors, machine learning offers data-driven insights into underrecognized predictors. Methods We developed an XGBoost gradient boosting model using 7,375 records from the EU-IDB Full Dataset (41.7% with intentional self-harm recidivism), employing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to identify key predictors. The model was optimized via dynamic threshold adjustment (optimal threshold: 0.3479). SHAP values are shown for each feature. Results The model demonstrated excellent accuracy: precision 0.78, recall 0.78 and an F1-score of 0.78, with an AUC 0.86. SHAP analysis revealed critical drivers of recurrence: Mechanism of injury (0.58), Activity when injured (0.33), and Object involved (0.29). Among the most impactful modalities by feature were: Mechanism of injury (foreign body 1.01, exposure to chemical or other substance 0.84); Activity when injured (other specified leisure or play 0.47, unspecified leisure or play 0.43); Object involved (personal grooming utensil 0.81 e.g. razor, razor blade and sedatives or antipsychotics 0.53). Although Age showed a moderate overall importance (0.20), individual-level analysis highlighted a subset of patients aged 46-62 years with significantly elevated SHAP values (up to 0.77). Temporal features such as the COVID-19 period had limited impact (0.06), indicating that pandemic effects were secondary to clinical and situational factors. Conclusions The model’s high accuracy (AUC 86%) supports its potential as a screening tool in emergency departments, a prioritization system for follow-up care, and a template for prevention programs. Future research should validate these findings across diverse healthcare systems. Key messages • Machine learning model predicts self-harm recidivism with high accuracy identifying key risk factors. • Key predictors are mechanism of injury, activity during injury, and objects involved, more than demographic factors. Topic Self-harm injury, Risk prediction, SHAP analysis.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_5)
Luxembourg Institute of Health (LU), Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL), National Institute of Health (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.