Does the Addition of MRI Help in Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Low Breast Tissue Density in Two Canadian Population-based High-Risk Breast Screening Programs?

Purpose To compare incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) by breast tissue density (BTD) and determine whether breast MRI adds diagnostic value in high-risk individuals with low-density breast tissue. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 10 233 screening breast MRI examinations performed between 2012 and 2022. For each examination, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BTD category was recorded. Patient charts were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) during the screening period. The nearest mammograms were reviewed to assess whether cancers were also visible at mammography. Results Among 10 233 female individuals screened, 91 cancers were detected (cancer detection rate [CDR] = 8.90 per 1000 examinations), with no evidence of a difference across BTD categories (<i>P</i> = .39). By BTD category, seven cancers (7.7%) were in category A, 34 (37.4%) in B, 40 (44.0%) in C, and 10 (11.0%) in D. Among 90 BCs detected at MRI, only 18 (20.0%) had a corresponding abnormality identified on the nearest screening mammogram. Of the 872 MRI examinations in individuals with category A BTD, six of seven cancers (85.7%) were detected at MRI alone and one (14.3%) was detected at both mammography and MRI. No evidence of a difference in incremental CDR was found across BTD categories (A = 6.9 per 1000 examinations; B = 5.9 per 1000; C = 8.3 per 1000; D = 7.5 per 1000; <i>P</i> > .50). Conclusion In high-risk individuals with low-density breasts (category A BTD), supplemental screening with breast MRI remained necessary despite improved mammographic sensitivity. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, MRI, Breast, Primary Neoplasms, Screening © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250073
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the Addition of MRI Help in Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Low Breast Tissue Density in Two Canadian Population-based High-Risk Breast Screening Programs?

Jean M. Seely, Mary Beth Bissell, David G. Martin, Lisa G. Smyth et al.
Radiology Imaging Cancer
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Does the Addition of MRI Help in Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Low Breast Tissue Density in Two Canadian Population-based High-Risk Breast Screening Programs?

Jean M. Seely, Mary Beth Bissell, David G. Martin, Lisa G. Smyth, Kristopher Hoover
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) by breast tissue density (BTD) and determine whether breast MRI adds diagnostic value in high-risk individuals with low-density breast tissue. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 10 233 screening breast MRI examinations performed between 2012 and 2022. For each examination, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BTD category was recorded. Patient charts were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) during the screening period. The nearest mammograms were reviewed to assess whether cancers were also visible at mammography. Results Among 10 233 female individuals screened, 91 cancers were detected (cancer detection rate [CDR] = 8.90 per 1000 examinations), with no evidence of a difference across BTD categories (<i>P</i> = .39). By BTD category, seven cancers (7.7%) were in category A, 34 (37.4%) in B, 40 (44.0%) in C, and 10 (11.0%) in D. Among 90 BCs detected at MRI, only 18 (20.0%) had a corresponding abnormality identified on the nearest screening mammogram. Of the 872 MRI examinations in individuals with category A BTD, six of seven cancers (85.7%) were detected at MRI alone and one (14.3%) was detected at both mammography and MRI. No evidence of a difference in incremental CDR was found across BTD categories (A = 6.9 per 1000 examinations; B = 5.9 per 1000; C = 8.3 per 1000; D = 7.5 per 1000; <i>P</i> > .50). Conclusion In high-risk individuals with low-density breasts (category A BTD), supplemental screening with breast MRI remained necessary despite improved mammographic sensitivity. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, MRI, Breast, Primary Neoplasms, Screening © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 7(6)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.