Complex Double-Event Rupture of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding Earthquake

ABSTRACT On 5 September 2022, a strong earthquake (Mw 6.6) struck Luding County, Sichuan, China, causing significant casualties and property damage and marking the deadliest earthquake in mainland China in eight years. Previous studies using seismologic and/or geodetic data estimated the centroid depth of the Luding earthquake, with results varying widely from 2 to 18.4 km depth. To investigate the cause of this discrepancy, this study first performed a single point–source moment tensor inversion and found that regional and teleseismic data prefer centroid depths of 6 and 17 km, respectively. This suggests that a single point–source model may not be adequate to characterize the rupture. We then used synthetic doublet models to test the sensitivity of regional and teleseismic data to subevent depths. The results support a model that the Luding earthquake comprises two subevents: a shallow event at 6 km depth (0.7×1019 N·m) and a deeper event at 17 km depth (0.3×1019 N·m), with the deeper one rupturing 7 s after the shallow one. A relocated hypocenter depth for the Luding earthquake, based on Pn/Pg relative location, also confirms a shallow nucleation. Furthermore, a multiple point–source inversion of the teleseismic data confirms the presence of two subevents. Although the deeper subevent had a smaller moment, it significantly influenced the single point–source centroid depth inversion. Our results suggest that the large variance in published centroid depth stems from different depth sensitivities of regional and teleseismic datasets to a complex source process with multiple subevents. Therefore, the multiple point–source inversion is crucial for accurately assessing seismic hazard and understanding the rupture processes of complex moderate events such as the Luding earthquake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240278
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complex Double-Event Rupture of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding Earthquake

Qingjun Meng, Han Zhang, Wangwang Gu, Zhe Jia et al.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Complex Double-Event Rupture of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding Earthquake

Qingjun Meng, Han Zhang, Wangwang Gu, Zhe Jia, Baolong Zhang, Sidao Ni, Yong Zhou, Minhan Sheng, Hongbo Han
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT On 5 September 2022, a strong earthquake (Mw 6.6) struck Luding County, Sichuan, China, causing significant casualties and property damage and marking the deadliest earthquake in mainland China in eight years. Previous studies using seismologic and/or geodetic data estimated the centroid depth of the Luding earthquake, with results varying widely from 2 to 18.4 km depth. To investigate the cause of this discrepancy, this study first performed a single point–source moment tensor inversion and found that regional and teleseismic data prefer centroid depths of 6 and 17 km, respectively. This suggests that a single point–source model may not be adequate to characterize the rupture. We then used synthetic doublet models to test the sensitivity of regional and teleseismic data to subevent depths. The results support a model that the Luding earthquake comprises two subevents: a shallow event at 6 km depth (0.7×1019 N·m) and a deeper event at 17 km depth (0.3×1019 N·m), with the deeper one rupturing 7 s after the shallow one. A relocated hypocenter depth for the Luding earthquake, based on Pn/Pg relative location, also confirms a shallow nucleation. Furthermore, a multiple point–source inversion of the teleseismic data confirms the presence of two subevents. Although the deeper subevent had a smaller moment, it significantly influenced the single point–source centroid depth inversion. Our results suggest that the large variance in published centroid depth stems from different depth sensitivities of regional and teleseismic datasets to a complex source process with multiple subevents. Therefore, the multiple point–source inversion is crucial for accurately assessing seismic hazard and understanding the rupture processes of complex moderate events such as the Luding earthquake.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 116(1)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), University of California, Los Angeles (US), South China Sea Institute Of Oceanology (CN), Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (CN), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.