Longitudinal quality of life assessment following robotic mitral valve repair versus conventional sternotomy

Objective: Robotic-assisted mitral repair has demonstrated excellent late outcomes without increased morbidity and mortality in experienced centers.Robust analysis of postoperative quality of life in large cohorts has been limited. Methods:Between January 1, 2020, and April 1, 2024, 563 adult patients who underwent mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation at our institution were retrospectively reviewed.Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Global Health 10-question survey (PROMIS-10) physical and mental scores, as well as MacNew social scores were evaluated at baseline and serial follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.Quality of life (QoL) metrics were evaluated longitudinally using a nonlinear multiphase mixed-effects regression model. Results:A total of 1493 postoperative QoL measurements were available in 563 patients (247 robotic vs 316 sternotomy).Patients who received a robotic approach were younger than those who underwent sternotomy (age 58 10 years vs age 66 10 years; P<.001) with fewer comorbidities and higher baseline PROMIS-10 physical (55 robotic vs 51 sternotomy; P<.001) and mental (57 vs 53; P<.001) scores.There was no significant difference in temporal outcomes between groups (physical: P = .11;mental: P = .84;social: P = .55).Each metric in both groups surpassed the population norm and returned to preoperative baseline within 6 months (graphical abstract). Conclusions:Postoperative QoL following mitral valve repair was excellent, regardless of approach.Patients who were selected for a robotic approach demonstrated higher baseline QoL metrics than those who received a sternotomy, but this did not translate to a comparative improvement on adjusted analyses and QoL for most patients returned to baseline by 6 months.The operative approach for mitral valve repair in patients who are candidates for a minimally invasive procedure should be tailored to surgeon experience in offering a safe, durable repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.001
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal quality of life assessment following robotic mitral valve repair versus conventional sternotomy

Daniel J.P. Burns, Eugene H. Blackstone, Penny L. Houghtaling, Lars Georg Svensson et al.
JTCVS Open
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

Longitudinal quality of life assessment following robotic mitral valve repair versus conventional sternotomy

Daniel J.P. Burns, Eugene H. Blackstone, Penny L. Houghtaling, Lars Georg Svensson, Nadia H. Bakir, L. Dipaola, Fachreza Aryo Damara, Tarek Malas, A. Marc Gillinov
article en

Abstract

Objective: Robotic-assisted mitral repair has demonstrated excellent late outcomes without increased morbidity and mortality in experienced centers.Robust analysis of postoperative quality of life in large cohorts has been limited. Methods:Between January 1, 2020, and April 1, 2024, 563 adult patients who underwent mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation at our institution were retrospectively reviewed.Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Global Health 10-question survey (PROMIS-10) physical and mental scores, as well as MacNew social scores were evaluated at baseline and serial follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.Quality of life (QoL) metrics were evaluated longitudinally using a nonlinear multiphase mixed-effects regression model. Results:A total of 1493 postoperative QoL measurements were available in 563 patients (247 robotic vs 316 sternotomy).Patients who received a robotic approach were younger than those who underwent sternotomy (age 58 10 years vs age 66 10 years; P<.001) with fewer comorbidities and higher baseline PROMIS-10 physical (55 robotic vs 51 sternotomy; P<.001) and mental (57 vs 53; P<.001) scores.There was no significant difference in temporal outcomes between groups (physical: P = .11;mental: P = .84;social: P = .55).Each metric in both groups surpassed the population norm and returned to preoperative baseline within 6 months (graphical abstract). Conclusions:Postoperative QoL following mitral valve repair was excellent, regardless of approach.Patients who were selected for a robotic approach demonstrated higher baseline QoL metrics than those who received a sternotomy, but this did not translate to a comparative improvement on adjusted analyses and QoL for most patients returned to baseline by 6 months.The operative approach for mitral valve repair in patients who are candidates for a minimally invasive procedure should be tailored to surgeon experience in offering a safe, durable repair.

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.