Spot-On or Stereotypical? A Social Relations Model of Life Satisfaction and Relationship Status Satisfaction Ratings Among Friends

We examined how people assessed their friends’ life satisfaction and relationship status satisfaction among 197 groups of four friends ( N = 788), using Social Relations Models. We found that variance in life satisfaction judgments was explained about equally by perceivers (23%) and targets (24%). However, variance in status satisfaction judgments was largely explained by targets (53%) rather than perceivers (9%). In other words, people tend to agree on which friends are satisfied, particularly with their status. Self-other agreement was higher for status satisfaction ( r = .53) than life satisfaction ( r = .39). The association between target relationship status and target effects of status satisfaction ( r = .69) was stronger than the association between target relationship status and target effects of life satisfaction ( r = .17), suggesting friends use relationship status as a cue when assessing status satisfaction. Results have implications for interpersonal perception, how relationship status impacts perception, and how life satisfaction relates to domain-specific satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251391467
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spot-On or Stereotypical? A Social Relations Model of Life Satisfaction and Relationship Status Satisfaction Ratings Among Friends

William J. Chopik, Richard E. Lucas, Jeewon Oh, Jason A. Mitala
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Spot-On or Stereotypical? A Social Relations Model of Life Satisfaction and Relationship Status Satisfaction Ratings Among Friends

William J. Chopik, Richard E. Lucas, Jeewon Oh, Jason A. Mitala
article en

Abstract

We examined how people assessed their friends’ life satisfaction and relationship status satisfaction among 197 groups of four friends ( N = 788), using Social Relations Models. We found that variance in life satisfaction judgments was explained about equally by perceivers (23%) and targets (24%). However, variance in status satisfaction judgments was largely explained by targets (53%) rather than perceivers (9%). In other words, people tend to agree on which friends are satisfied, particularly with their status. Self-other agreement was higher for status satisfaction ( r = .53) than life satisfaction ( r = .39). The association between target relationship status and target effects of status satisfaction ( r = .69) was stronger than the association between target relationship status and target effects of life satisfaction ( r = .17), suggesting friends use relationship status as a cue when assessing status satisfaction. Results have implications for interpersonal perception, how relationship status impacts perception, and how life satisfaction relates to domain-specific satisfaction.

Social Psychological and Personality Science
Syracuse University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.