“I Think It’s Exciting and Frightening at the Same Time”: Audience Sentiments Toward the Use and Labeling of Generative AI in Journalism

This study explores audience sentiments toward generative artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism by analyzing in-depth qualitative interviews with Danish news consumers. Findings show that while the users acknowledge AI’s potential to improve efficiency and writing quality—and are sometimes delighted by the prospects—they emphasize the need for a human journalist in the loop. Many are concerned about AI replacing human journalists; some fear AI’s capacity to produce fake news, biased content, and clickbait, while others find AI annoyingly inappropriate and its writing generic and impersonal. Regarding transparency and labeling, opinions range from seeing it as irrelevant or context-dependent to essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251385943
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Think It’s Exciting and Frightening at the Same Time”: Audience Sentiments Toward the Use and Labeling of Generative AI in Journalism

Ingelise Andersen, Jonas Nygaard Blom, Lene Heiselberg, Arjen van Dalen
1 citations
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

“I Think It’s Exciting and Frightening at the Same Time”: Audience Sentiments Toward the Use and Labeling of Generative AI in Journalism

Ingelise Andersen, Jonas Nygaard Blom, Lene Heiselberg, Arjen van Dalen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores audience sentiments toward generative artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism by analyzing in-depth qualitative interviews with Danish news consumers. Findings show that while the users acknowledge AI’s potential to improve efficiency and writing quality—and are sometimes delighted by the prospects—they emphasize the need for a human journalist in the loop. Many are concerned about AI replacing human journalists; some fear AI’s capacity to produce fake news, biased content, and clickbait, while others find AI annoyingly inappropriate and its writing generic and impersonal. Regarding transparency and labeling, opinions range from seeing it as irrelevant or context-dependent to essential.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.