Characterizing students’ energy learning trajectories

Abstract Enabling students to apply their energy knowledge to various everyday phenomena is one of the main goals of physics education. Understanding how and why some students achieve this goal and others not is crucial to adapt instruction in order to better support the majority of students. To achieve support, research suggests that it is not sufficient to solely focus on content knowledge, but also include affective and metacognitive variables. To better understand why some students are able to apply their energy understanding while others are not, we developed a ten-week-long instructional unit to collect fine-grained longitudinal data, not only on the energy understanding of students but also their affective and metacognitive characteristics. Using unsupervised machine learning, specifically a k-means longitudinal analysis, we were able to distinguish, from N = 165 students, three clusters based on students’ learning trajectories, represented by their energy knowledge network coherence. These three clusters were then analyzed on basis of affective and metacognitive variables. The analysis showed disparities in the accumulation of energy knowledge. These disparities were then be analyzed in greater detail by the trajectories of affective and metacognitive variables, mainly showing disparities in the perception of the instructional unit regarding emotions and cognitive load. These findings indicate that affective and metacognitive variables have an impact on the learning outcome of students, which can be used to design instructional units, that address the needs of all students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00141-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing students’ energy learning trajectories

Marcus Kubsch, Knut Neumann, Sebastian Gombert, Tobias Wyrwich et al.
1 citations
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
article

Characterizing students’ energy learning trajectories

Marcus Kubsch, Knut Neumann, Sebastian Gombert, Tobias Wyrwich, Diana Domenichini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Enabling students to apply their energy knowledge to various everyday phenomena is one of the main goals of physics education. Understanding how and why some students achieve this goal and others not is crucial to adapt instruction in order to better support the majority of students. To achieve support, research suggests that it is not sufficient to solely focus on content knowledge, but also include affective and metacognitive variables. To better understand why some students are able to apply their energy understanding while others are not, we developed a ten-week-long instructional unit to collect fine-grained longitudinal data, not only on the energy understanding of students but also their affective and metacognitive characteristics. Using unsupervised machine learning, specifically a k-means longitudinal analysis, we were able to distinguish, from N = 165 students, three clusters based on students’ learning trajectories, represented by their energy knowledge network coherence. These three clusters were then analyzed on basis of affective and metacognitive variables. The analysis showed disparities in the accumulation of energy knowledge. These disparities were then be analyzed in greater detail by the trajectories of affective and metacognitive variables, mainly showing disparities in the perception of the instructional unit regarding emotions and cognitive load. These findings indicate that affective and metacognitive variables have an impact on the learning outcome of students, which can be used to design instructional units, that address the needs of all students.

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchVol. 7(1)
University of Pisa (IT), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.