Comparative evaluation of SNP-weighted, Bayesian, and machine learning models for genomic prediction in Holstein cattle

In our dataset, BayesR achieves the highest predictive performance, while GBLUP maintained the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Although weight models perform well for some traits, their overall performance remains inferior to that of the traditional Bayesian model. As more causal SNPs for complex traits are identified, the predictive accuracy of weighted models is expected to further improve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Genomics
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-12218-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of SNP-weighted, Bayesian, and machine learning models for genomic prediction in Holstein cattle

Jinfeng He, Bo Han, Qi Zhang, Qin Zhang et al.
3 citations
BMC Genomics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
article

Comparative evaluation of SNP-weighted, Bayesian, and machine learning models for genomic prediction in Holstein cattle

Jinfeng He, Bo Han, Qi Zhang, Qin Zhang, Weijie Zheng, Dongxiao Sun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In our dataset, BayesR achieves the highest predictive performance, while GBLUP maintained the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Although weight models perform well for some traits, their overall performance remains inferior to that of the traditional Bayesian model. As more causal SNPs for complex traits are identified, the predictive accuracy of weighted models is expected to further improve.

BMC GenomicsVol. 26(1)
Ministry of Agriculture (ID), Shandong Agricultural University (CN)
China Agricultural University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of SNP-weighted, Bayesian, and machine learning models for genomic prediction in Holstein cattle — Jinfeng He, Bo Han, et al. · BMC Genomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS