Operationalising and measuring equity in implementation science for global health

Equity in research—that is, ensuring fair participation, power-sharing, and benefit across the research process—has become a central ambition in global health as part of wider efforts to reach health equity.1 Since 2015, implementation science has attempted to place equity at the core of health programmes to benefit both patients and health systems. Yet, in practice, equity remains an afterthought and is often considered after interventions have been designed or evaluated.2 As a result, local expertise might be marginalised, opportunities for adaptation are lost, and interventions that cannot accommodate real-world complexity risk failure at the point of delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Global Health
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00316-x
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalising and measuring equity in implementation science for global health

Dhruva Ghosh, Rachel C. Shelton, Ismaïl Lawani, Aneel A Bhangu et al.
The Lancet Global Health
Global Health and Surgery
article

Operationalising and measuring equity in implementation science for global health

Dhruva Ghosh, Rachel C. Shelton, Ismaïl Lawani, Aneel A Bhangu, Sivesh Kathir Kamarajah, Anita Eseenam Agbeko, Lisa R Hirschorn
article en

Abstract

Equity in research—that is, ensuring fair participation, power-sharing, and benefit across the research process—has become a central ambition in global health as part of wider efforts to reach health equity.1 Since 2015, implementation science has attempted to place equity at the core of health programmes to benefit both patients and health systems. Yet, in practice, equity remains an afterthought and is often considered after interventions have been designed or evaluated.2 As a result, local expertise might be marginalised, opportunities for adaptation are lost, and interventions that cannot accommodate real-world complexity risk failure at the point of delivery.

The Lancet Global HealthVol. 14(2)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Université d'Abomey-Calavi (BJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.