Navigating blinding challenges in complex intervention trials: insights from a UK researcher survey

This survey offers insights into the views of experienced UK-based researchers on blinding in complex intervention RCTs. Four key findings emerged: (1) the challenges of blinding due to the inherent complexity of these interventions, (2) the essential role of blinding in reducing bias, (3) the variability in the feasibility of outcome assessment blinding due to practical and resource constraints and (4) the positive impact of stakeholder involvement in addressing blinding challenges. However, respondents expressed dissatisfaction with current quality assessment tools and held divergent views on outcome assessment blinding, highlighting the need for more definitive methodological guidance on blinding in complex intervention trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09223-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating blinding challenges in complex intervention trials: insights from a UK researcher survey

Sarah Gerard Dean, R. S. Taylor, William Levack, Fiona C Warren et al.
2 citations
Trials
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.63
article

Navigating blinding challenges in complex intervention trials: insights from a UK researcher survey

Sarah Gerard Dean, R. S. Taylor, William Levack, Fiona C Warren, Jean Hay‐Smith, A. Yonis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This survey offers insights into the views of experienced UK-based researchers on blinding in complex intervention RCTs. Four key findings emerged: (1) the challenges of blinding due to the inherent complexity of these interventions, (2) the essential role of blinding in reducing bias, (3) the variability in the feasibility of outcome assessment blinding due to practical and resource constraints and (4) the positive impact of stakeholder involvement in addressing blinding challenges. However, respondents expressed dissatisfaction with current quality assessment tools and held divergent views on outcome assessment blinding, highlighting the need for more definitive methodological guidance on blinding in complex intervention trials.

TrialsVol. 26(1)
University of Exeter (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.