Bayesian D‐Optimal Designs for Gaussian Process Surrogate Models

ABSTRACT Computer experiments often employ space‐filling strategies to create surrogate models with strong predictive performance. The impact of model parameter estimation for Gaussian process surrogates, however, is often overlooked. Obtaining a better initial estimate of the covariance lengthscale parameter, , can greatly improve the resulting Gaussian process fit through more effective sequential acquisitions during active learning. In this work, we propose a novel initial design maximizing the Bayesian D‐optimality criterion of the Gaussian process lengthscale parameter. Previously published results have shown the emphasis on lengthscale estimation to be promising, but relied on an empirically driven design creation process. Our Bayesian D‐optimal designs are rooted in information theory and lead to more informative sequential acquisitions by improving lengthscale estimation. In many cases, these gains eventually result in better surrogates than those seeded with space‐filling initial designs. Furthermore, Bayesian D‐optimal designs can be tailored to either isotropic or anisotropic covariance structures, and the Bayesian framework enables the inclusion of prior knowledge in the design process, offering greater flexibility and adaptability. Through several simulation studies, we demonstrate the advantages of Bayesian D‐optimal designs in terms of both lengthscale estimation accuracy and predictive performance during active learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.70116
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian D‐Optimal Designs for Gaussian Process Surrogate Models

Kevin R. Quinlan, Boya Zhang, Patrick McHugh
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
article

Bayesian D‐Optimal Designs for Gaussian Process Surrogate Models

Kevin R. Quinlan, Boya Zhang, Patrick McHugh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Computer experiments often employ space‐filling strategies to create surrogate models with strong predictive performance. The impact of model parameter estimation for Gaussian process surrogates, however, is often overlooked. Obtaining a better initial estimate of the covariance lengthscale parameter, , can greatly improve the resulting Gaussian process fit through more effective sequential acquisitions during active learning. In this work, we propose a novel initial design maximizing the Bayesian D‐optimality criterion of the Gaussian process lengthscale parameter. Previously published results have shown the emphasis on lengthscale estimation to be promising, but relied on an empirically driven design creation process. Our Bayesian D‐optimal designs are rooted in information theory and lead to more informative sequential acquisitions by improving lengthscale estimation. In many cases, these gains eventually result in better surrogates than those seeded with space‐filling initial designs. Furthermore, Bayesian D‐optimal designs can be tailored to either isotropic or anisotropic covariance structures, and the Bayesian framework enables the inclusion of prior knowledge in the design process, offering greater flexibility and adaptability. Through several simulation studies, we demonstrate the advantages of Bayesian D‐optimal designs in terms of both lengthscale estimation accuracy and predictive performance during active learning.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 42(2)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), The Ohio State University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.