British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and Royal College of Pathologists Delphi consensus guidance on biopsy sampling during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients

These guidance statements represent a practical approach to tissue sampling in the upper gastrointestinal tract during endoscopy in adult patients, outlining instances when biopsies should and should not be taken. Analysis of data from the UK National Endoscopy Database has shown wide variations in biopsy practice among endoscopists. Endoscopy providers with high rates of post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer take more inappropriate and less appropriate biopsies during endoscopy. This guidance document was commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) as part of its Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement programme and developed in line with the BSG guidance methodology. A systematic literature review was performed to review the evidence base. However, due to the low quality of evidence in this area, application of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was not possible and therefore Good Practice Statements, along with Expert Opinions, were used for recommendations. In total, 32 statements or recommendations were initially created and voted on by members of the Guidance Development Group on a five-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Statements achieving over 80% agreement were adopted. Following voting, one statement did not achieve consensus and was removed, and one statement was amended. All statements achieved over 80% agreement following a second round of voting. In formulating this guidance document, we hope that it will standardise biopsy practice for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Outlining when not to undertake tissue sampling will in turn reduce pressure on histopathology services, reduce costs in the National Health Service, and improve sustainability in endoscopy and pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Gastroenterology
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2025-103316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and Royal College of Pathologists Delphi consensus guidance on biopsy sampling during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients

Oliver Bendall, N P J Cripps, Adrian C Bateman, Matthew L. Banks et al.
1 citations
Frontline Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and Royal College of Pathologists Delphi consensus guidance on biopsy sampling during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients

Oliver Bendall, N P J Cripps, Adrian C Bateman, Matthew L. Banks, B OATES, Neil A. Shepherd, Helen R. Griffiths, Neil Haslam, Nigel John Trudgill, Amira Babikir, Pradeep Bhandari, Michael Osborn, Amar Srinivasa, James Catton, Nikki Husbands, Saswata Banerjee, Shahd A. Mohamed, Allan J. Morris, Farhana Sultana-Miah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

These guidance statements represent a practical approach to tissue sampling in the upper gastrointestinal tract during endoscopy in adult patients, outlining instances when biopsies should and should not be taken. Analysis of data from the UK National Endoscopy Database has shown wide variations in biopsy practice among endoscopists. Endoscopy providers with high rates of post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer take more inappropriate and less appropriate biopsies during endoscopy. This guidance document was commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) as part of its Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement programme and developed in line with the BSG guidance methodology. A systematic literature review was performed to review the evidence base. However, due to the low quality of evidence in this area, application of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was not possible and therefore Good Practice Statements, along with Expert Opinions, were used for recommendations. In total, 32 statements or recommendations were initially created and voted on by members of the Guidance Development Group on a five-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Statements achieving over 80% agreement were adopted. Following voting, one statement did not achieve consensus and was removed, and one statement was amended. All statements achieved over 80% agreement following a second round of voting. In formulating this guidance document, we hope that it will standardise biopsy practice for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Outlining when not to undertake tissue sampling will in turn reduce pressure on histopathology services, reduce costs in the National Health Service, and improve sustainability in endoscopy and pathology.

Frontline Gastroenterology
University of Gloucestershire (GB), Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), British Thoracic Society (GB), Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), North West London Pathology (GB), Bronllys Hospital (GB), British Cardiovascular Society (GB), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB), NHS England, University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.