Land change, fire, and climate weaken carbon sink in the conterminous United States

The land carbon sink of the conterminous United States was evaluated using a bottom-up modeling framework and 30-meter land change data from 1985 to 2020. This cross-scale, cross-landscape, and cross-system approach tracked fractional land cover changes and applied regional model calibration. Results show average terrestrial and aquatic carbon sinks of +110 ± 37 and +19 ± 0.5 teragrams of carbon per year, respectively. The terrestrial carbon sink, showing no clear trend, peaked in the 1990s, with more years as a carbon source since 2000, contradicting recent national and global studies. Land change had the largest impact (-70 ± 5.5 teragrams of carbon per year), exceeding impacts of climate (-33 ± 48 teragrams of carbon per year), wildfire (-7.7 ± 2.4 teragrams of carbon per year), and erosion transport (-1.9 ± 0.13 teragrams of carbon per year). The positive CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect (+69 ± 12 teragrams of carbon per year) was insufficient to maintain the carbon sink strength. Our framework reveals key paths of carbon loss, with implications for carbon budget and energy policies in the United States and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx7823
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land change, fire, and climate weaken carbon sink in the conterminous United States

Grant M. Domke, Paul C. Selmants, Qiuan Zhu, Mark A. Cochrane et al.
Science Advances
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Land change, fire, and climate weaken carbon sink in the conterminous United States

Grant M. Domke, Paul C. Selmants, Qiuan Zhu, Mark A. Cochrane, Robert G. Striegl, Eric J. Ward, Kimberly P. Wickland, Lisamarie Windham‐Myers, Terry L. Sohl, Kristin B. Byrd, Benjamin M. Sleeter, Jinxun Liu, Bin Wang, Tamara S. Wilson, Christopher E. Soulard, Zhiliang Zhu, Todd J. Hawbaker, Qiang Zhou, Zhen Zhang
article en

Abstract

The land carbon sink of the conterminous United States was evaluated using a bottom-up modeling framework and 30-meter land change data from 1985 to 2020. This cross-scale, cross-landscape, and cross-system approach tracked fractional land cover changes and applied regional model calibration. Results show average terrestrial and aquatic carbon sinks of +110 ± 37 and +19 ± 0.5 teragrams of carbon per year, respectively. The terrestrial carbon sink, showing no clear trend, peaked in the 1990s, with more years as a carbon source since 2000, contradicting recent national and global studies. Land change had the largest impact (-70 ± 5.5 teragrams of carbon per year), exceeding impacts of climate (-33 ± 48 teragrams of carbon per year), wildfire (-7.7 ± 2.4 teragrams of carbon per year), and erosion transport (-1.9 ± 0.13 teragrams of carbon per year). The positive CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect (+69 ± 12 teragrams of carbon per year) was insufficient to maintain the carbon sink strength. Our framework reveals key paths of carbon loss, with implications for carbon budget and energy policies in the United States and beyond.

Science AdvancesVol. 11(46)
United States Geological Survey (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), US Forest Service (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), Hohai University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), Science Systems and Applications (United States) (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.