Low genetic differentiation among morphologically distinct <i>Cycas</i> species informs the delineation of conservation management units

These findings indicate C. armstrongii and C. maconochiei subsp. maconochiei likely represent a morphologically variable species. In addition to updating the threat assessment, we recommend: (1) formally recognizing genetically depauperate or geographically isolated populations (e.g. Tiwi Islands) as conservation management units (CMUs); (2) establishing new ex situ assurance collections for at-risk CMUs; and (3) implementing assisted gene flow among genetically compatible populations to enhance adaptive potential. These actions will ensure conservation strategies are tailored to evolutionary and ecological units.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Botany
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf276
Primary Topic
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low genetic differentiation among morphologically distinct Cycas species informs the delineation of conservation management units

Gregory Kenicer, Rachael V. Gallagher, Nicholas Cuff, Michael Calonje et al.
Annals of Botany
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
article

Low genetic differentiation among morphologically distinct Cycas species informs the delineation of conservation management units

Gregory Kenicer, Rachael V. Gallagher, Nicholas Cuff, Michael Calonje, Caroline Chong, Markus Ruhsam, James A. R. Clugston, Murray J. Henwood, Richard I. Milne, Kayla Claravall
article en

Abstract

These findings indicate C. armstrongii and C. maconochiei subsp. maconochiei likely represent a morphologically variable species. In addition to updating the threat assessment, we recommend: (1) formally recognizing genetically depauperate or geographically isolated populations (e.g. Tiwi Islands) as conservation management units (CMUs); (2) establishing new ex situ assurance collections for at-risk CMUs; and (3) implementing assisted gene flow among genetically compatible populations to enhance adaptive potential. These actions will ensure conservation strategies are tailored to evolutionary and ecological units.

Annals of BotanyVol. 137(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Montgomery Botanical Center (US), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU), Department of Land Resource Management (AU), Western Sydney University (AU), University of Edinburgh (GB)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division, Australasian Systematic Botany Society, Nature Conservancy, Australian Flora Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.